Vol.

176,

May

15,

No.

3, 1991

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

Pages

1991

1610-1616

PRIMARY STRUCTURE OF MOUSE TYROSINE HYDROXYLASE DEDUCED FROM ITS cDNA Shinichi Ichikawa, Toshikuni Sasaoka,and ToshiharuNagatsu* Departmentof Biochemistry, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya 466, Japan Received

April

12,

1991

SUMMARY: The cDNAs for tyrosine hydroxylase were cloned from a mousebrain cDNA library by plaquehybridization. Sincethe IongestcDNA clone lacked approximately 150 bp sequenceof its N-terminal region, additional 5’ region was obtainedusingpolymerasechainreaction. Nucleotidesequencedeterminationof cDNAs revealedthat mousetyrosine hydroxylase m-RNA encodes498 amino acidswith a calculatedmolecularmassof 55990. The aminoacid sequenceof mousetyrosine hydroxylase is highly homologusto rat ( 97% ) andhuman( 92% ) enzymes. o 1991 Academic

Press,

Inc.

Tyrosine hydroxylase ( tyrosine 3-monooxygenase;tyrosine, tetrahydropteridine: oxygen oxidoreductase( 3-hydroxylating ), EC l-14.16.2.) ( TH ) catalyzes the fist and rate-limiting stepin catecholaminebiosynthesis( 1 ). This enzyme is expressedin catecholaminergicneuronsin the discreteregionsof the brain, noradrenergicneuronsof sympatheticgangliaand sympatheticnerves,and noradrenalineand adrenalinecells of adrenalmedulla. TH plays a central role in neuronaltransmissionand hormonalaction of catecholamines( 2 ). The cDNA cloning of TH for human ( 3,4,5 ), rat ( 6 ), bovine ( 7 ), quail ( 8 ), and fruit fly ( 9 ) have already beenreported. On the other hand,a laboratory mouseis one of the mostimportant animalsasa standardsystem, and the study of the mousegeneticsbecomeincreasinglyimportant by the advent of transgenicbiology. Recently, transgenicmice over-expressinghumanTH hasbeenproduced ( 10 ). However, mouseTH hasnot beenstudiedintensively. In this communication,we report on the cDNA cloning of mouseTH and the determinationof its nucleotidesequence.

MATERIALS

AND METHODS

Library screening: A mousebrain cDNA library ( strain ICR, 7 weeksold ) in hgt 10 vector was a generousgift from Dr. ShigeoOhno, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science. A humanTH cDNA ( type 4 ) waslabeledwith [a-P32ldCTP ( 3000 Ci / m mol ) by Multiprime DNA labelling system( Amex-sham) and usedas a probe ( 11 * To whom all correspondenceshouldbe addressed. 0006-291X/91 Copyright All rights

$1.50

0 1991 by Academic Press, of reproduction in any form

OK. reserved.

1610

Vol.

176,

No.

3, 1991

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

). A total of 106 k phage plaques on E.&i strain C6CO h~7 lawn cells were screened. The plaques were Lifted onto nylon membranes ( Hybond-N, Amersham ). The membranes were prehybridized for lhr at 42°C in a buffer containing 6 x SSC ( 1 x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl and 0.015 M sodium citrate ), 0.1% SDS, 5 x Denhartdt’s solution, 50% formamide, and salmon sperm DNA (100 pg./ ml ). Hybridization followed at 42°C for 24 hrs in the above specified buffer with the labeled human TH cDNA ( type 4 ). The membranes were washed at 42” C with 2 x SSC containing 0.1% SDS twice. DNA sequence analysis: The plasmids containing the mouse TH cDNAs were treated with exonuclease JII and mung bean nuclease to construct nested deletions of various lengths ( 12 ). Nucleotide sequence was determined by the dideoxynucleotide chain termination method using Sequenase (United States Biochemical Corp., Cleaveland, OH ) ( 13 ). PCR ( polymerase chain reaction ) cloning: Lambda gt 10 forward primer was obtained from Takara Shuzo, Co., LTD ( Kyoto, Japan ). Other oligonucleotides were synthesized by using an Applied biosystems DNA synthesizer. The sequences of primers are shown as follows: S’dGCTGGGTAGTCCCCACC 3’ ( xgt 10 primer ) 5’dTCCAATGGGTTCCCAGGTT 3’( primer A ), S’dGCACTATGCCCACCCCCAGCGC 3’ ( primer B ), 5’dGGACAGCATJTCCATCCCTCTCCTC 3’( primer C ), S’dCCGTGTCTGAGCTGGACGCCAAGCAGGC 3’( primer D ), SdCCTTGCGGGCGTCCTCGATGAGGCTCTG 3’( primer E ). Primers, D and E were designed using human TH sequence. Primers, A, B, and C were either identical or complementary to mouse TH sequence. PCR ( 14 ) was performed in 100 t.t.lof a reaction mixture containing template DNA ( 1 ug of DNA prepared from amplified library or 5 t.tlof fust step PCR reaction mixture ) in 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl ( pH 9.0 ), 1.5 mM MgC12,0.01% gelatin, 0.1% Triton X-100,200 t.tM each of dNTPs ( dATP, dTTP, dCTP, and dGTP ), and a pair of primers ( 20 pmoles each ). The primers and conditions used are shown as follows: pTH-1: first step, hgt 10 forward primer and primer A; second step, hgt 10 forward primer and primer E; 94°C 1 min, 57°C 1 min ,72”C 1 min and 30sec, 30 cycles for both steps. pTH-2: first step, primers B and C, 93-C 2 min, 72°C 1 min, 30 cycles; second step primers C and D, 94” C 1 min, 65” C 1 min and 72°C 1 min and 30sec, 30 cycles. pTH-3: first step, primers B and C, 93” C 2 min, 72°C 1 min, 30 cycles; primers A and B, 94°C 1 min, 57°C 1 mitt, 72°C 1 min and 30 set, 30 cycles. The DNA fragments amplified were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and cloned into pUCl19 vector directly ( pTH-1 ) or after digestion with Pst I ( pTH-2 and pTH-3 ). RNA blot analysis: Total RNA ( 10 ug ) from mouse adrenal was subjected to electrophotesis on 1.2% agarose gel containing formaldehyde and tmnsblotted onto a nylon membrane ( Hybond-N, Amersham ) ( 11). Hybridization was carried out in 5 x SSPE ( 1 x SSPE contains 0.18 M NaC1,lO mM NaPO4 ( pH 7.7 ) and 1 mM EDTA ) containing 50% formamide, 0.5% SDS, 5 x Denhardt’s solution, 100 ug/ ml of salmon sperm DNA and cDNA fragment labelled with [a-32P]dCTP by a multi-prime labelling method. The blot was washed with 2 x SSC containing 0.1% SDS and with 0.1 x SSC containing 0.1% SDS, each for 15 min at 50°C.

RESULTS cDNA isolation

AND DISCUSSION

and sequencing:

Five positive clones were obtained by screening of lo6 plaques. These were purified, and digested with EcoRI to yield inserts, the largest of which ( LTH- 1 > was 1.7k bp. This insert was subcloned into a Blue Script KS vector ( STRATAGENE, CA ) and its sequence in both orientations was determined. By analogy with rat sequence, it was suggested that hTH-1 was not a full-length clone 1611

Vol.

176,

No.

BIOCHEMICAL

3, 1991

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

and lacked approximately 150 bp sequence of its 5’ end. Thus, we undertook to derive additional sequence information 5’ to hTH-1 by the PCR cloning. Three experiments were performed to obtain 5’ region of mouse TH cDNA using two steps PCR (MATERIALS

AND METHODS

). For the first step, DNA prepared from the library

was used as a template. Since no obvious bands were observed on agarose gel after 30 cycles of PCR, one-twentieth of reaction mixture was then subjected to second PCR. In the second step, one of two primers used in the fust step was shifted to inner position to improve the specificity of PCR. The other primer was used for the both, first and second steps (Fig. 1 ). In each experiment, only a single species of DNA was amplified after the second step. These cDNAs were cloned in pUCll9 vector ( pTH-1, pTH-2, and pTH-3 ) and their nucleotide sequences were determined. Overlapping sequences of all four clones, including XTH-1, displayed perfect match. Sequence of each cDNA was highly homologus to rat sequence, providing the strong evidence that it is the mouse TH cDNA.

The restriction map and structure of cDNAs obtained are shown in Fig. 1. The

inserts of LTH 1 and pTH 3 were connected at Pst I site and a full-length cDNA was constructed. The cDNA coding for the mouse TH is 1494 bp long with 5 bp 5’ untranslated and 258 bp 3’ untranslated regions. The consensus polyadenylation AATAA precede a stretch of poly (A)+ residues at the 3’ end ( Fig. 2 ).

signal

Only one class of TH m-RNA was observed in RNA blot with an RNA analysis: estimated size of 1.6 kb ( Fig. 3 ). The multiplicity of TH m-RNA was reported in human ( 3,4,5 ) and monkey tissues ( 15 ). These m-RNAs

are constant for the most

part but differ as to the insertion or deletion of 12 and 8 1 bp sequence near the 5’ end. Since the molecular weight differences of these m-RNAs are relatively small, they could not be deteced separately by Northern blot analysis. Thus, we used PCR to detect these

hTH 1

pTH

1

I

t

t-H

-c EA

pTH

2

!,D

-* 6

-

I -

100 bp

pTH 3

Fig. 1. Snuctureandrestrictionmapof mouseTH cDNA. Closed box, protein coding region;arrows,primersusedto obtaincDNAs; H, theregionof cDNA containedin eachclone;l---l, harm.

1612

Vol.

176,

No.

1

1

3,

BIOCHEMICAL

1991

Met Pro Thr Pro Ser Ala GC ACT RTG CCC ACC CCC AGC ‘XC

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

Ser Ser Pro Gin Pro Lys Gly Phe Arq Arq Ala Val TCC TCG CCA CAG CCC AAG GGC TTC AGA AGA GCC GTC

18 59

19 60

Ser Gl" Gin Asp Thr Lys Gin Ala Gl" Ala "al Thr Ser Pro Arq Phe Ile Gly Arg Arg TCA GAG CAG GAT ACC AAG C&G GCC GAG GCT GTC ACG TCC CCA AGG TTC A T T GGA CGG CGG

38 119

39 120

Gin Ser Le" Ile Glu Asp Ala Arq Lys Gl" Arq Glu Ala Ala Ala Ala Ala Ala Ala Ala C&G AGT CTC ATC GAG GAT GCC CGC A?& GAG CGG GAG GCA GCA GCA GCT GCA GCA GCG GCT

58 179

59 180

Ala Val Ala Ser Ala Gl" Pro Gly &is!? Pro Le" Glu Ala "al GCG GTA GCC TCC GCG GAA CCT GGG AAC CCA T T G GAG GCT Gn;

"al Phe Gl" Gi" Arg Asp GTA TTC GAG GAG AGG GET

78 239

79 240

Gly Asn Ala Val Leu Asn Le" Le" Phe Ser Leu Arg Gly Thr Ly, Pro Ser Ser Le" Ser CGA AAT GCT G T T CTC AX CTG CTC TTC TCC T T G AGG GGT &CA A?,23 CCC TCC TCR CTG TCT

98 299

99 300

Rrq Ala Le" Lys Val Phe Glu Thr Phe Glu Ala Lys Ile His "is Leu CGG GCT T T G AAA GTG T T T GAG KCA T T T GAP. GCC AAT, ATC CAC C.&C TTA

Gl" Thr Arg Pro GAG ACC CGG CCT

119 359

119 360

Ala Gin Arq Pro Leu Ala Gly 5er GCC CAG AGG CC?, CTG GCA GGA WC

Pro "is Le" Glu Tyr Phe Val Ar9 Phe Glu "al Pro CCC CAC CTG GAG TX T T T GTG CGC TTC GAG GTG CCC

138 419

139 420

Ser Gly Rsp Leu Ala Ala Leu Le" Se= Ser Val Arg Arg Val Ser Asp Asp Val Ar9 Ser ACT GGC GAC CT-Z GCT GCC CTC CTC AGT TCT GTG CGT CGG GTG TCT GAC GAT GTG CGC AGT

158 479

159 480

Ala Arq Glu Asp Lys Val Pro Trp Phe Pro Arg Lys "al Ser Gl" Leu Asp Lys Cys His GCC AGA GAG GAC iLAG G T T CCC TGG TTC CCA AGG AAA GTG TC& GAG TTC GAT A&G T G T CAC

178 539

179 540

His Leu Val Thr Lys C.&C CTG GTC ACC MG

19E 599

199 600

Ala Tyr Arq Gin Arq Arq Lys te" Ile Ala GCG T A T CGC C&G CGC CGG AAG CTG A T T GCA

219 660

Pro Ile Pro His Val Gl" Tyr CCA A T T CCC CAC GTG GAA TX

Ala GCC

238 719

239 720

Thr Leu Lys Gly Leu Tyr Ala Thr His Ala Cys Arg Glu His Le" G1" Ala Phe Gin Leu ACG CTG AAG GGC CTC T A T GCT ACC CAT GCC TGC CGG GAA CAC CTG GAG GCT TTC CAG CTT

258 779

259 780

Leu Gl" Arg Tyr Cys Gly Tyr Arq CTG GAI\ CGG TAC T G T GGC TAC cm

278 839

219 840

Phe Leu tys Glu Arg Thr Cly Phe Gin Leu Arg Pro "al Ala Gly Leu Leu 5er Ala Arg TTC T T G ARG G&A CGG ACT GGC TTC CAG CTG CGA CCC GTG GCC GGT CT?, CTG TCT GCC CGT

298 899

299 900

Asp Phe Lc" GAT T T T cm

318 959

319 960

Ser WC

Phe Asp Pro Asp Leu Asp Le" Asp His Pro Gly Phe 5er Asp Gl" T T T GAC CCT GAC CTG GAC CTG GAC CAT CCG GGC TTC TCT GAC CAG Gl" Ile Ala GAG A T T GfC

Phe Gin Tyr Lys Gin Gly Gl" TTC CAR TAC SAG CAG GGT GAG

Thr Lys Glu Gl" Ile Ala Thr Trp Lys Gl" "al Tyr RCA ARC GAG GAA A T T GCT ACC TGG AAG GAG GTA TX

Glu Asp Ser Ile Pro Gin Le" Glu Asp "al Set His GAG GAc RGC A T T cc.4 CAG CTG GAG GAT GTG TCT c*c

Ala Ser Le" Ala Phe Ar9 "al Phe Gl" Cys Thr GCC AGT CTG GCC T T c CGT GTG T T T CAG TGC *ctt

Gin Tyr Ile Arq His Ala CAG TAC ATC CGT C*T GCC

218 659

Ser Pro Met His Ser Pro Gl" Pro Asp Cys Cys His Gl" Le" Le" Gly His Val Pro 338 TCA CCT ATG CRC TCA CCC GAG CCA GAC TGC TGC CAC GAG CTG CTG GGA CAC GTA CCC 1019

339 1020

Met Leu Ala Asp Arq Thr Phe Ala Gl" Phe Ser Gin Asp Ile Gly Leu Ala Ser Le" Gly 358 ATG T T G GCT GAC CGC AC.=. T T T GCC CAG TTC TCC CAG GAC A T T CGA CTT GCA TCT CTG GGG 1079

359 IOEO

Ala Ser Asp Gl" Gl" Ile G1" tys Leu Ser Thr Val Tyr Trp Phe Thr "al Gl" Phe Gly 378 GCT TCA GAT GAA GA.& A T T GAP, PlAA CTC TCC RCG GTG TAC TGG TTC ACT GTG GAG T T T GGG 1139

379 1140

Leu cn;

399 1200

Glu Ix" GAG CTC

419 1260

Ala "al Gin Pro Tyr Gin Asp Gin Thr Tyr Gin Pro "al Tyr Phe Val Ser Gl" SK Phe 438 GCC GTG CAG CCC TAC CAA GAT CAA ACC TAC CAG CCG GTG TAC TTC GTG TCA GAG AGC TTC 1319

439 1320

Ser Asp Ala L,‘s Asp Lys Le" Arg As" Tyr Ala Ser Arg Ile Gin A=9 Pro Phe Ser Val 458 AGT GAT GCC AAG GAC FAG CTC AGG AAC T A T GCC TCT CGT ATC CAG CCC CCA TTC TCT GTG 1379

459 1380

Lys Phe Asp Pro Tyr AAG T T T GAC CCG TX

419 1440

Ser Le" Gl" Gly Val Gin Asp Gl" Le" His Thr Le" Thr Gl" Ala Le" Ser Ala Ile 5er 498 TCC T T A GAG GGG GTC CAG GAT GAG CTG CAC ACC CTG ACC CAA GCA CTG AGT GCC A T T AGC 1499

499 1500

*** TAT, ATG CAT AGG GTA CCA CCC ACA GGT GCC AGG GGC CTT KC

Cys Lys TGT m

Gin cw

As" Gly Cl" IUT GGG em

Leu Lys Ala Tyr Gly Ala Gly Le" Leu Ser Ser CTG w,G GCT T&C GG* GCA GGG CTG CTG TCT xc

Tyr Tm

Gly 398 GGA 1199

Le" His Ser Leu Ser Gl" Gl" Pro Glu Val Afq Ala Phe Asp Pro Asp Thr Ala 418 CTG CAC TCC CTG TCA GAG GAG CCC GAG GTC CGG GCC T T T GAC CCA GAC ACA GCA 1259

Thr Le" Ala Ile Asp "al Leu Asp Ser Pro Hia Thr Ile Arg Arq ACC CTG GCC A T T GAT GTA CTG GAC AGT CCT CAC ACC ATC CGG c‘C

478 1439

499 CAA AGT TCC CAG CCC CTT 1559

1560

CTC CPA CCT TTC CTG GCC C.&G AGG CTT TCC CAT GTG T G T GGC TGG ACC CT-I TGA TGG GCT 1619

1620

GCT CTT GGT CCC CCT CCT CC.4 cTG CTP CT‘? AX

CAC ATC T T A CTA CTG CAT GCG CTC C&G 1679

1680

GAT GGT CCT GCA TTC CTC CTG CCC TTC ATG Cl-G T A T TCT AU.7 CTG A T T A T T ATTC TC-

1739

1740

AAG GAA GGA AAG GTC

1774

TCC

AAA AAA AM,

AA& AApl A?+

Fig. Nucieotide and deduced amino acid sequence of mouse tyrosine hydroxylase. Polyadenylation signal is underlined. 1613

Vol.

176,

No.

3, 1991

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

-18s

11872-

03

04

-Type

2

-Type

1

1234567

Fi .3. Northern blot analysis. Total RNA ( 10 pg ) of mouse adrenal was hybridized

272. P labelled hTH-1 as described in MATERIALS 28s and 18s rRNA are indicated

AND METHODS.

Positions of

Fig. Agarose gel electrophoresis of TH cDNA amplified by PCR. Single stranded cDNA was synthesized using 10 pg of RNA with Murine Molony Leukemia Virus reverse transcriptase ( Bethesda Research Laboratories ) and primer E. Double stranded cDNA were synthesized and amplified using primer D, primer E, and Taq DNA polymerase ( Promega Biotechnology ) for 30 cycles ( 93’C, 2 min and 72” C, lmin ). cDNAs were electrophoresed in 4% Nusieve ( FMC Bioproduct ) GTG agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. Lane 1, +X/ HaeIII marker ; lane 2, RNA minus control; lane 3, human type 1 TH cDNA; lane 4 human type 2 TH cDNA; lane 5, Macaca irus, adrenal; lane 6, mouse, adrenal; lane 7, rat, brain.

subtypes. A singlespeciesof m-RNA correspondingto type 1 TH was detectedin RNA from mouseand rat, while two speciesof m-RNA were detectedin monkey tissue ( Fig. 4 ). From theseresults,we suggestthat there are only a singlespeciesof TH mRNA strongly expressedin mouse. Amino acid sequence analysis: The amino acid sequenceof mouseTH is deducedfrom nucleotidesequence.When the first ATG is usedasthe initiation codon, mousePI codesfor 498 amino acidsand hasa calculatedmolecularmassof 55990. Amino acid sequenceof mouseTH is comparedwith thoseof rat and humanenzymes. As shown in Fig 5, sequencesof TH from thesesourceswere highly homologusto each other. The sequenceof mouseTH exhibits 97% and92% homology with rat and human enzymes,respectively. It is known that TH activity is modulatedby severalfactors. Among them, activation of TH by phosphorylationis the mostimportant short term regulation of the enzyme. Major putative phosphorylationsitesof rat TH locatedin the N-terminal region are conservedin mouseTH ( for example, SerSfor prolinedirected protein kinase( 16 ), SerI9 and Ser40 for Ca2+/ calmodulin-dependentprotein kinase, and Se@ and Ser153 for CAMP-dependentprotein kinase) ( 17 ). 1614

Vol.

176,

No.

BIOCHEMICAL

3. 1991

1 1 1

Mouse Rat HUllan Mouse Rat Human

51

51 51

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

MPTPSASSPQPKGFRRAVSEQDTKQAEAVTSPRFIGRRQSLIEDARKERE ------P---------------A------------------------------D-TT--A---------L-A-----IM-------------------AAAAAARAAVASAEPGNPLEAVVFEERDGNAVLNLLFSLRGTKPSSLSRA ------------S--------------------------------------V-------P-.---D-----A---KE-N--------p-A----A----

Mouse Rat HUllJaIl

101 101 100

LKVFETFEAKIHHLETRPAQRPLAGSPHLEYFVRFEVPSGDLAALLSSVR v------------------------------------------------V---------------------R--G--------L--RR--------G--

Mouse Rat Human

151

RVSDDVRSAREDKVPWFPRKVSELDKCHHLVTKFDPDLDLDHPGFSDQAY -------------------------------------------------A

Mouse Rat Human

201 201 200

RQRRKLIAEIAFQYKQGEPIPHVEYTKEEIATWKEVYATLKGLYATHACR ---------------H---------A----------"-------------------------RH-D---R---------------T------------

Mouse Rat HUlXltl

251 251 250

EHLEAFQLLERYCGYREDSIPQLEDVSHFLKERTGFQLRPVAGLLSARDF ----G----------------------R-------------------------A-A----FS-----N-------------------------------

Mouse Rat Human

301 301 300

LASLAFRVF,7CTQYIRHASSPMHSPEPDCCHELLGHVPMLADRTFAQFSQ _____________-__--_------------------------------_--___-__-___-__--__------------------------------

Mouse Rat Human

351 351 350

DIGLASLGASDEEIEKLSTVYWFTVEFGLCKQNGELKAYGAGLLSSYGEL _------___-----__---------------------------------------------------LS--------------V--------------

Mouse Rat Human

401 401 400

LHSLSEEPEVRAFDPDTAAVQPYQDQTYQPVYFVSESFSDAKDKLRNYAS --------------------------------------N------------C------I-----EA------------S--------S-------S---

Mouse Rat Human

451 451 450

RIQRPFSVKFDPYTLAIDVLDSPHTIRRSLEGVQDELHTLTQALSAIS

151 150

COMMUNICATIONS

Q--E----pAGp--------------------------------------

--------------------------Q-------------AH------

-----------------------QAVR----------D---------G

Fig. Alignment of amino acid sequences for mouse, rat, and human ( type 1 ) tyrosine hydroxylase. Hyphen, amino acid identical to that of mouse; dot, gap.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by a Grant -in-Aid for Scientific Research, from the Ministery of Education, Science and Culture, Japan. We thank Dr. Shigeo Ohno for giving us a mouse brain cDNA library. We also thank Dr. Hiroshi Ichinose for helpful discussions.

REFERENCES 1. Nagatsu, T., Levitt, M., and Udenfriend , S. ( 1964 > J. Biol. Chem. m, 2910-2917. 2. Catecholamines: Basic and Peripheral Mechanisms (eds. Usdin, E., Carlsson, A., Dahlstorm, A., and Engel, J. ) (1984 ) Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. 3. Grima, B., Lamouroux, A., Boni, C., Julien, J.-F., Javoy-Agid, F., and Mallet, J. (1987 ) Nature %,707-711. 4. Kaneda, N., Kobayashi, K., Ichinose, H., Kishi, F., Nakazawa, A., Kurosawa, Y., Fujita, K., and Nagatsu, T. (1987 ) B&hem. Biophys. Res. Commun *-,146 971-975. 5. Kobayashi, K., Kaneda, N., Ichinose, H., Kishi, F., Nakazawa, A., Kurosawa, Y., Fujita, K., and Nagatsu, T. (1987 ) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 6733. 6. Grima, B., Lamouroux, A., Blanot, F., Biguet, N.F., and Mallet, J. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA a.67 I-621. 1615

Vol.

176,

No.

3, 1991

BIOCHEMICAL

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

COMMUNICATIONS

7. D’Mello, S. R., Weisberg, E. P., Stachowiak, M. K. , Turzai, L. M., Gioio, A. E., and Kaplan, B. B. (1988 ) J. Neurochem. Res. 19, 440-449. 8. Fauquet, M., Grima, B., Lamourox, A., and Mallet J. ( 1988 ) J. Neurochem. 3, 142-148. 9. Neckameyer, W. S. , and Quinn, W. G. (1989 ) Neuron 2, 1167- 1175. 10. Kaneda,-N., Sasaoka, T., Xobayashi, K., K&hi, K., Nagatsu, I., Kurosawa, Y., Fujita, K., Yokoyama, M., Nomura, T., Katsuiki, M., and Nagatsu, T. ( 1991 ) Neuron, 6, 1-12. 11. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F., and Sambrook, J. ( 1989 ) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Mammal, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 12. Heinkoff, S. ( 1984 ) Gene &351-359. 13. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. ( 1977 ), Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA B,54635467. 14. Saiki, R. K. Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A. and Amheim, N. ( 1985 ) Science 230, 1350-1354. 15. Ichikawa, S., Ichinose, H., and Nagatsu, T., ( 1990 ) B&hem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 173, 1331-1336. 16. Vulliet, P. R., Hall, F. L., Mitchell, J. P., and Hardie, D. G. ( 1989 ) J. Biol. Chem. a, 16292-16298. 17. Zigmond, R. E., Schwartschild, M. A., and Ritten house., A. R. ( 1989 ) Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 12.415-46 1.

1616

Primary structure of mouse tyrosine hydroxylase deduced from its cDNA.

The cDNAs for tyrosine hydroxylase were cloned from a mouse brain cDNA library by plaque hybridization. Since the longest cDNA clone lacked approximat...
691KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views