825
Sonographic Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 197.217.94.181 on 10/15/15 from IP address 197.217.94.181. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
Intestinal
Diagnosis Malrotation
of in Infants:
Importance of the Relative Positions Superior Mesenteric Vein and Artery
Ed Weinberger1 William D. Winters Robert M. Liddell David M. Rosenbaurn Dale Krauter
OBJECTIVE.
An abnormal
relative
position
of the superior
of the
mesenteric
vein and artery
can be present in patients with intestinal malrotation. We undertook this retrospective study to see how often we could determine the relative position of these vessels on
abdominal
sonograms
associated
with malrotation.
in infants
and how often
abnormal
position
of the vessels
was
MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed the radiology files and medical records of 337 infants with vomiting who were referred for sonography because of possible pylonc stenosis. We used sonograms and written reports to determine the position of the superior mesenteric vessels. The position was considered normal when the superior mesenteric vein was to the right of the superior mesenteric artery on transverse sonograms. The position was considered abnormal when the vein was directly ventral to the artery or when the vein was to the left of the artery. Sonographic findings were compared with results of upper gastrointestinal series when possible and with clinical outcome. RESULTS. The relative positions of the superior mesenteric vein and artery were evident in 249 (74%) of the 337 patients. Abnormal orientation of the mesenteric vessels was detected in nine patients. In five patients, the superior mesenteric vein was located to the
left
of
the
artery,
and
all
five
had
intestinal
malrotation.
In four
patients,
superior mesenteric vein was directly ventral to the artery, and one of malrotation. CONCLUSION. Sonographic assessment of the relative positions of the artery and vein is an important adjunct in the examination of infants with pyloric stenosis. Patients in whom sonograms show an abnormal position of should have further examination to detect malrotation. AJR
159:825-828,
October
the
these
had
mesenteric suspected the vessels
1992
Abnormal orientation of the superior mesenteric vessels has been reported in patients with intestinal malrotation [1 -5] with the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) immediately ventral (anterior) to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), or the SMV to the left of the SMA.
assessment for infants
Received February vision April 13, 1992. sity
26, 1992; accepted after re-
‘All authors: Departments of Washington, School
WA 98195, Center,
98105.
and Children’s
of Radiology, of Medicine,
Hospital
UniverSeattle,
During
of the positions having sonography
the past
several
years,
we have
included
sonographic
of the SMA and SMV as part of our routine workup because of possible pyloric stenosis. We undertook
this retrospective study to see how often an abnormal orientation of the SMV and SMA could be detected in these infants and how often such an abnormal orientation was associated with intestinal malrotation. Because intestinal malrotation can become a life-threatening emergency if the common complications of obstruction by Ladd’s diagnosis
bands or midgut volvulus are not detected of this disorder is important.
Materials
and
and treated
promptly,
early
and Medical
4800 Sand Address
at Children’s
Point Way, N.E., Seattle, WA reprint requests to E. Weinberger
Hospital and Medical Center.
0361-803X/92/i 594-0825 CAmencan Roentgen Ray Society
During
because
a
21/2
Methods year period,
of suspected
pyloric
343 patients stenosis.
at our hospital Ten
patients
had
had 353 sonographic two
examinations
examinations (the
second
one
826
usually
WEINBERGER
after
surgery
for pyloric
stenosis),
and the results
ET AL.
AJR:159,
October
1992
of these
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 197.217.94.181 on 10/15/15 from IP address 197.217.94.181. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
second examinations were excluded from our study. Six patients’ sonograms or charts were unavailable for review, and these patients also were excluded. The remaining 337 sonographic studies in 337 patients formed the basis of our investigation. We follow a standard technique for sonographic examination of the abdomen [6]. We also attempt to visualize the SMV and SMA by placing the transducer
ventral to the mesenteric vessels and assessing their orientation as far caudal to the confluence of the portal and splenic veins as possible. The position of the SMV was considered normal when the vein was located laterally to the right of the SMA. The position was considered abnormal when the vein was located ventral to or laterally to the left of the SMA. Patients of the vessels were
whose sonograms showed that the positions abnormal then had an upper gastrointestinal
series. At our hospital,
an upper gastrointestinal
series is the proce-
dure of choice
for an infant with suspected malrotation, both. Sonography is the first and usually the only imaging
when pyloric
stenosis
when the clinician wants nonbilious vomiting.
For our retrospective
is suspected
because
to rule out pyloric
of clinical findings
stenosis
in an infant
or with
study, the radiology files and medical records
of all 337 patients were reviewed. All of the sonograms were reviewed and compared with the written report of the study with regard to the positions of the SMV and the SMA.
The study population the patients
stenosis,
was
.
Fig. 1.-24-day-old
boy who had nonbillous
(range,
2-21 8 days);
patients
had no evidence
the SMA,
Results
showed
The relative positions of the SMV and SMA were evident from the sonograms or the written reports in 249 (74%) of 337 patients. In 56 patients (1 7%), bowel gas prevented adequate visualization of the vessels. In 32 patients (9%), neither the sonograms nor the written report included mention of the vessels (26 of these 32 patients had pyloric stenosis, so the examination may have been abbreviated). Abnormal orientation of the mesenteric vessels was detected in nine of the 249 patients in whom the relationship of the vessels could be evaluated. In five of these patients, the SMV was located to the left of the SMA; all five had intestinal malrotation. One patient had had surgery for malrotation and midgut volvulus (results of an upper gastrointestinal series confirmed malrotation but without obstruction). One patient had had repair of a gastroschisis on the day of birth and had pyloric stenosis (Fig. 1). The other three patients had unmalrotation
confirmed
by
series
tion (Fig. 3).
In four of the patients, the SMV was ventral to the All four patients had upper gastrointestinal series. One four had malrotation and obstruction due to Ladd’s and had immediate surgical repair (Fig. 4). (A history of not known review
at the time of sonography, of this
patient’s
medical
SMA. of the bands bilious
was noted chart.)
in
Another
had small-bowel obstruction as a result of adhesions from previous surgical repair of an inguinal hernia. The other two
of malrotation
and are clinically
by upper
in whom the SMV was to the right of
37 (1 5%) had upper
no evidence
as shown well.
gastrointestinal
series,
which
of malrotation.
Discussion
Intestinal embryologic
mairotation encompasses a wide spectrum of failures of rotation and fixation of the gut, result-
ing in a narrow-based
presence sent
of abnormal
indirect
predispose
attempts
attachment peritoneal at fixation
to midgut volvulus
of the mesentery and the (Ladd’s) bands that repre[4].
These
and obstruction.
abnormalities
Although
most
patients have bilious vomiting and signs of obstruction in the first few months of life [7-9], some may remain asymptomatic
or have atypical clinical findings that may be misleading [4, 9]. In this last group of patients, earlier diagnosis might prevent complications of malrotation, including bowel ischemia, necrosis, and death. We were able to detect intestinal malrotation correctly
subsequent
upper gastrointestinal series. Two of these had obstruction due to Ladd’s bands and had immediate surgical repair (Fig. 2); one had microgastria and had malrotation without obstruc-
retrospective
for 36
127 had pylonc
Of the 240 patients
vomiting,
vomiting
chisis on day of birth.
gastrointestinal
intestinal
projectile
hr. Transverse sonogram shows superior mesenteric vein (v) to left of superior mesentenc artery (a). Lumen of superior mesenteric artery can be recognized by surrounding rim of echogenicity. Note thick pyloric muscle (arrowheads). Patient had pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis. Intestinal malrotation was substantiated during surgical repair of gastros-
included 239 boys and 98 girls. Mean age of
6.6 weeks
and 2i 0 did not.
suspected
i_u
volvulus, or study done
on sonograms
in four patients
in whom
this problem
was not suspected, and in only one of these patients did a review of the chart suggest bilious vomiting. In 1983, Nichols and Li [1] described three adults in whom CT showed that the SMV was located on the left ventral aspect of the SMA instead of the right ventral aspect. They termed this finding the “SMV rotation sign”; upper gastrointestinal examinations showed various degrees of intestinal malrotation in all three patients. In 1 986, Blumhagen and
Weinberger [2] detected the same abnormal position of the two vessels on sonograms of a 15-year-old girl with intestinal malrotation. In 1987, Gaines et al. [3] showed sonographically that the SMV was located directly anterior to or to the left of
INTESTINAL
AJR:159, October 1992
MALROTATION
:
;).e.s:’4P1
:
827
#{149}:‘w’ .w.
.
-.
IN INFANTS
.
-
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 197.217.94.181 on 10/15/15 from IP address 197.217.94.181. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
‘U.
Fig. 2-18-day-old boy who had intermittent nonbilious vomiting for 48 hr. A, Transverse sonogram below level of confluence of splenic and portal veins shows mesenteric vein (v) at left lateral aspect of superior mesenteric artery (a). ao = aorta, i vena cava. B, Sonogram
shows
intermittent
distension
of duodenum
After upper gastrointestinal Ladd’s bands.
series, surgery confirmed
the SMA
and two adults
in three
children
b
=
duodenal
known
malro-
=
bulb.
with obstruction
boy with emesis.
Trans.
by
tation, as shown by previous upper gastrointestinal series. Gaines et al. also suggested the diagnosis of malrotation on the basis of sonographic findings in an 1 i-year-old child in whom abnormal orientation of the mesenteric vessels was discovered during sonography done because of urinary tract infection. These studies, as well as ours, suggest that using sonography to evaluate the relationship between the SMV
scans showed that the SMV was to the left of the SMA but in whom upper gastrointestinal series did not show malrotation. Conversely, normal orientation of mesenteric vessels (SMV to the right of SMA) does not ensure normal intestinal rotation, even though this was seen in our patients who had subsequent upper gastrointestinal series. Leiberman and Haaga [1 1 ] described a patient with malrotation shown by upper gastrointestinal series in whom CT scans showed
and the SMA may be helpful intestinal malrotation.
normal orientation of mesenteric vessels. Finally, the finding of the SMV directly ventral to the SMA is probably indeter-
in the diagnosis
with
by fluid.
intestinal malrotation
Fig. 3.-b-day-old
verse sonogram just below level of confluence of splenic and portal veins shows superior mesentenc vein (v) at left ventral aspect of superior mesenteric artery (arrowhead). so = aorta, s = spine. Upper gastrointestinal series showed malrotation and microgastna.
superior inferior
of unsuspected
Malrotation was present in all our patients in whom the SMV was located to the left of the SMA; and although this seems to be the rule [1 -5], it is not always the case. Zerin and DiPietro [1 0] described a 20-year-old patient in whom CT
minate
for
malrotation;
one
of our
vascular relationship had malrotation. scan farther caudally in the patients might have found more inferiorly.
that the SMV
four
patients
with
this
If we had been able to without malrotation, we
was to the right
of the SMA
Sonographic assessment of the orientation of mesenteric vessels must be done with great care. Two important points in technique are worth mentioning. First, scanning must be
done as far caudally as possible from the confluence of the splenic and portal veins, because at this level the SMV may be almost directly ventral to the SMA, resulting in an incorrect diagnosis Fig.
4.-Trans-
verse
sonogram superior mesenteric vein (v) ventral to superior mesenteric artery shows
(arrowhead).
Upper
gastrointestinal sers showed duodenal obstruction. At surgery, malrotation with Ladd’s bands was found.
of abnormal
orientation
of mesenteric
vessels.
Sec-
ond, the transducer must be placed in the midline directly anterior to the vessels in order to assess orientation correctly. As the vessels may be obscured by gas, it is often tempting to move the transducer to the right of midline to use the liver as an acoustic window. This, however, results in the SMV appearing to have a more leftward or clockwise orientation with
respect
to the SMA,
resulting
in an incorrect
of abnormal orientation. We do not think that sonography gastrointestinal
examination
for
the
should diagnosis
diagnosis
replace
upper
of intestinal
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 197.217.94.181 on 10/15/15 from IP address 197.217.94.181. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
828
WEINBERGER
malrotation. Rather, sonographic assessment of the relationship of the mesenteric vessels may provide useful information in patients with intestinal malrotation who are asymptomatic or have atypical signs and symptoms. Specifically, our study suggests that sonographic assessment of the relationship of the mesenteric vessels is an important adjunct in the evaluation of the young child who has signs suggestive of pyloric stenosis. When the position of the SMV with respect to the SMA is abnormal, further evaluation via an upper gastrointestinal series is warranted. REFERENCES 1 . Nichols DM, Li DK. Superior mesentenc malrotation. AJR i983;1 41:707-708
2. Blumhagen JD, Weinberger In: 5anders 1986:99-140
RC,
Hill
M,
vein rotation: a CT sign of midgut
E. Pediatric gastrointestinal eds.
Ultrasound
annual.
ultrasonography. New York: Raven,
ET AL.
3. Gaines
AJR:159, October 1992
PA, Saunders
AJS,
Drake D. Midgut :51-53
ultrasound. Clin Radiol i987;38 4. Loyer E, Eggli KD. Sonographic relationship
in malrotation.
malmotation
diagnosed
by
evaluation of superior mesentenc vascular
Pediatr
Radiol
i989;19:
173-175
5. Shatzkes 0, Gordon DH, HaIler JO, Kantor A, DeSilva A. Malrotahon of the bowel: malalignment of the superior mesentenc artery-vein oomplex shown by CT and MR. J Comput Assist Tomogr i990;14:93-95 6. Blumhagen JD, Macun L, Krauter D, Rosenbaum DM, Weinberger E. Sonographic diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. AJR i988;1 50: 1367-1370 7. Stewart
DR, Colodny
AL, Daggett
WC. Malrotation
of the bowel
in infants
and children: a 15 year review. Surgery 1976;79 :716-720 8. Andrassy RJ, Mahour GH. Malmotation of the midgut in infants and children: a 25-year review. Arch Surg i98i;1 16:158-160 9. Spigland N, Brandt ML, Ya.zbeck S. Malmotation presenting beyond the neonatal period. J Pediatr Surg i990;25: 1139-1142 10. zenn JM, DiPietro MA. Mesenteric vascular anatomy at cT normal and abnormal appearances. Radiology i99i;179:739-742 1 1 . Lieberman JM, Haaga JR. Duodenal malrotation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982;6: 101 9-1 020