Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 221.176.181.221 on 11/05/15 from IP address 221.176.181.221. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
135
Treatment of Suppurative by Percutaneous Catheter Drainage
#{149}.:.
Jordan B. Renner1’2 Michelle W. Age&
154:135-138,
Septic must
arthritis
CB 751 0, University Hill, Chapel
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510. Address reprint
requests to J. B. Renner. 2 Department of Medical Allied Health Professions,
University
of North
Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-751 0. 0361-803X/90/1541-0135 © American Roentgen Ray Society
at Chapel
Hill,
January
is a grave
be eradicated
antibiotic
joint
be decompressed
may
therapy
or as reported
Materials
and Methods
Five
were
patients
1990
disease.
completely
adequate aspirations, catheters.
Presented at the annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society, New Orieans, LA, May 1989. 1 Department of Radiology, Schcol of Medicine,
.
.
Percutaneous catheter drainage to treat suppurative arthritis was performed in five joints in five patients. Joints drained included the hip in two cases and one case each of a hip joint prosthesis, an ankle joint, and a glenohumeral joint. Organisms isolated from the joints included Staphylococcus aureus in one hip joint and the hip prosthesis, and Haemophilus influenzae in the ankle joint. Specific organisms were not isolated in the other hip joint or in the shoulder joint. Systemic antibiotic therapy was used in all five patients, and in two patients gentamicin was instilled through the catheters. Joint infection was managed successfully with catheter drainage and antibiotics in three patients. In all three cases, the range of motion was restored and the patients became free of pain after catheter drainage. These three patients remained asymptomatic at follow-up ranging from 3 weeks to 9 months. In two patients, percutaneous drainage failed. In one patient, the catheter positions could not be maintained and the catheters repeatedly became dislodged. In the other, superimposed osteomyelitis necessitated surgical debridement. No complications occurred. Our experience suggests that suppurative arthritis can be successfully treated with drainage of the joint via a percutaneous catheter in combination with antibiotic therapy. AJR
Received May 18, 1989; accepted after revision August 22, 1989.
Arthritis
referred
lfjoint
and
and prompt surgically,
here,
for
function
quickly.
and complete through
by means
aspiration
is to be preserved,
Successful the
use
of drainage
of fluid
to
treat
aspirated included two hips, one in an IV drug abuser who debridement in the same joint for suppurative arthritis (Fig. CS-level quadriplegia (Fig. 2); a prosthetic hip in a patient (Fig. 3); an ankle in a patient with an episode of bacteremia a shoulder in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus ditis,
nephritis,
and
formation
of multiple
abscesses
(Fig.
treatment
drainage of repeated
the infection requires
both
of the joint.
The
percutaneous
via percutaneously
suspected
pyarthrosis.
placed
Joints
had previously undergone surgical 1) and the other in a patient with with severe rheumatoid arthritis after plasmapheresis (Fig. 4); and complicated by cerebritis, pericar-
5).
Each joint was entered from the approach most likely to facilitate gravity-aided drainage. Organisms isolated from the joint aspirates included Staphylococcus aureus from the drug abuser’s hip and the prosthetic hip and Haemophilus influenzae from the ankle. Specific organisms were not isolated in the quadriplegic patient or in the patient with lupus. After purulent material was aspirated from the joint, a pigtail catheter was inserted by using a modified Seldinger technique [1]. Once the needle entered the joint, a guidewire was inserted, followed by dilators and a pigtail catheter. Catheters used included two 5.5-French catheters (Electro-Catheter Corp., Rahway, NJ), sutured in position in the patient with lupus, an 8.3French self-retaining catheter (Cook, Bloomington, IN) in the drug abuser, and 6-French self-
RENNER
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 221.176.181.221 on 11/05/15 from IP address 221.176.181.221. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
136
AND
AGEE
AJA:154,
January
1990
Fig. 1.-34-year-old
male IV drug abuser had had partial resection of the femoral head for osteomyelitis and pyarthrosis. He presented with hip pain 6 aureus was aspirated from hip. Anteroposterior radiograph of hip after placement of 8.3-French pigtail catheter shows catheter positioned over partially resected femoral head. 13 days of catheter drainage and antibiotic therapy resufted in sterilization of joint aspirate and restoration of range of motion. Patient remained asymptomatic 4 months after removal of catheter. months
after
surgery,
Fig. 2.-27-year-old
and Staphylococcus
male quadriplegic
in whom abdominopelvic
CT scan revealed
and although aspiration of joint yielded pus, no organism was isolated from cuftures. contrast material through catheter opacified hip joint as well as fistulous tract (arrow)
22 days of catheter drainage, osteomyelitis
of femoral head and acetabulum
an air/fluid A 6-French
level in hip. Patient pigtail
was already
receiving
antibiotics,
catheter was placed percutaogously. Injection of with a greater trochanteric abscess cavity. Despite
communicating necessitated surgical debridement.
Fig. 3.-46-year-old man with rheumatoid arthritis previously had undergone 14 joint replacements. He presented with hip pain, and Staphylococcus aureus was aspirated from hip. Initially, joint was drained surgically, but 9 days after surgery, patient again became febrile, and pus containing grampositive cocci was aspirated from joint. 6-French catheter was placed in hip. contrast injection opacified joint and a greater trochanteric abscess cavity. Patient was ambulating fully after 5 days of catheter drainage and antibiotic therapy, at which time joint aspirates were sterile. No recurrent joint infection
was noted on follow-up 9 months later.
(average, throughout
1 4 days). Systemic antibiotic the catheter treatment.
therapy
was
continued
Results In three through
drainage.
Fig. 4.-62-year-old
woman
with renal failure had Haemophilus
influen-
zae bacteremia after plasmapheresis. Ankle pain developed, and pus containing gram-negative reds was aspirated from ankle and subtalar
joints. A 6-French pigtail catheter was placed in posterior recess of ankle joint. Contrast injection opacified both ankle and subtalar joints. Catheter drainage was continued for 12 days, after which joint aspirate was sterile and range of motion was restored. Patient remained asymptomatic 3 weeks after removal of catheter.
catheters
(Medi-tech,
Inc.,
Watertown,
MA)
was
use of antibiotic
included
treated
satisfactorily
therapy
and catheter
the prosthetic
hip joint, the
hip that had been surgically
and the drug abuser’s
for an earlier bout of suppurative
arthritis.
Catheter
drainage was completed in 5-1 3 days (average, 1 0 days). In each case, catheter drainage and antibiotic therapy resulted in restoration of range of motion of the affected joint, sterilization of the joint aspirate, and resolution of the patients’ joint symptoms. At follow-up, ranging from 3 weeks to 9 months, the patients remained asymptornatic. In two cases, the catheter treatment failed. In one of these cases,
osteomyelitis
of the femoral
head
and acetabulum
in
the quadriplegic patient necessitated surgical debridement. In the patient with lupus, the catheter positions could not be stabilized adequately, the catheters were dislodged repeatedly, and surgical drainage was required. The percutaneous catheter was tolerated well by all patients,
retaining
the infection
These joints
ankle joint,
treated
cases,
the combined
and no catheter-related
complications
occurred.
in the remaining
patients. In all patients, a constant, low-pressure suction bulb (Jackson-Pratt reservoir, American V. Mueller, Chicago, IL) was applied to the catheter, and in the drug abuser and the patient with rheumatoid arthritis, gentamicin was intermittently delivered directly into the joint through the catheter. Catheters were left in place for 5-22 days
Discussion Successful treatment relief of pain, restoration
of bacterial septic of joint motion,
arthritis results and prevention
in of
AJA:154,
January
CATHETER
1990
DRAINAGE
IN SUPPURATIVE
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 221.176.181.221 on 11/05/15 from IP address 221.176.181.221. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
tion
ARTHRITIS
fail to eradicate
137
the
infection
[9],
when
the
infected
joint
is deep, such as the hip, or when the inflammatory debris or articular loculations prevent adequate aspiration [8, 1 0]. The results of needle aspiration are comparable to, if not better than, those associated with surgical drainage [8]. Patients treated surgically vs those receiving nonsurgicaljoint drainage may differ in the infecting organism, the duration of symptoms before initiation of therapy, the presence of any coexisting medical or surgical disease, and the inability to treat deep joints with repeated aspirations easily [8]. It appears, however,
Fig. 5.-21-year-old woman with complicated systemic lupus erythematosus developed multiple abscesses and was receiving multiple antibiotics. Serosanguinous fluid was aspirated from subdeltoid bursa, and although pus was aspirated from glenohumeral joint, no organism was isolated. Two catheters were placed in shoulder girdle. One catheter (arrow) entered glenohumeral joint via a posterior approach. Second cath-
eter drained subdeltoid/subacromial bursa. Catheters were securely sutured in place, but repeatedly dislodged in patient’s room. surgical drainage of glenohumeral joint was required 19 days after placement of cathe-
that
the sequelae of osteoarthrosis and ankylosis [2]. This requires appropriate antibiotic therapy, immobilization of the joint, and drainage of the affected articulation. Appropriate antibiotic therapy must include systemic
decompression
and treated with months). The joint
long-term effusion
of the
five
reinfections
through
noninfected
fluid
time
[3-5].
In these
any
human
isolated
studies,
organism.
antibiotics
Several
investigated
included penicillin G, phenoxymethyl penicillin, nafcillin, cephaloridine, cloxacillin, tetracycline, erythromycin, and lincomycin in the first study [3], ampicillin, methicillin, penicillin, and cephalothin in the second [4], and ampicillin and kanamycin
in the
third
[5].
Administration
was
oral,
intramuscular,
and IV, depending on the antibiotic being administered. In each of these studies, articular antibiotic concentrations equalled or exceeded serum concentrations and, except for erythromycin [3], were in excess of the antibiotic concentrations required for inhibition or killing of the organisms usually causing suppurative arthritis. Nelson [4] suggested that, because of altered synovial permeability to the passage of antibiotic molecules in the setting of synovial inflammation, the peak serum antibiotic concentration may precede the peak articular concentration, but this and other studies mdicate that effective articular antibiotic levels can be reached without the use of intraarticular antibiotic instillation. Furthermore, the intraarticular administration of antibiotics may be counterproductive
because
they
may
produce
a chemical
[6, 7]. Decompression of the infected joint is required if joint function is to be preserved [8]. Undrained pus retards the effectiveness of antibiotics. Joint effusion and inflammatory debris destroy the articular cartilage and lead to degenerative osteoarthrosis or ankylosis [8]. Traditionally, decompression synovitis
of septic
arthritis
has
been
repeated needle aspiration age has been advocated
performed
of the infected when antibiotic
surgically
or through
joint. Surgical draintherapy and aspira-
subsequently
not
(average, syndrome”
managed
arthroscopic
collections,
biotics
toward
may
2
lavage
success-
in four
and
after
synovial centesis with yttrium-90 in one. Percutaneously placed catheters have been used widely and effectively in the management of a variety of infected and
investigators have studied the intraarticular concentrations of antibiotics attainable through systemic administration of anti-
directed
joint
antibiotic therapy and the “inflammatory
was
a second
eter drainage of joint Sanders and Staple angiocatheter into an pain decreased after
treatment
of a septic
were resolved in 36 (78%) joints after the initial arthroscopic treatment. Five patients had a persistent articular infection, and five others became reinfected after initial success. Each fully,
ters.
surgical
be mandatory. A recent multicenter study reported the use of arthroscopic debridement and drainage of septic knees [1 1 ]. In this study, 46 septic knees were drained and lavaged arthroscopically
the
joint
A letter
fluid
was
clear
by Proubasta
of one
infected
but limited
experience
with
cath-
infections has been reported [1 2, 13]. [1 2] placed an 1 8-gauge translumbar infected shoulder joint. Their patient’s 1 0 days of catheter drainage, at which and
the
catheter
et al. [1 3] reported
hip and
one
infected
was
removed.
catheter
shoulder.
drainage
In their
report,
the
affected joints showed “no further abnormality” at a minimum of 6 months follow-up. These authors reported no complications. In two
of our five
cases,
percutaneous
drainage
failed.
Our
failure in one case due to repeated dislodgment of the catheters emphasizes the importance of maintaining catheter stability. In our other failed case, osteomyelitis of the femoral head and acetabulum required surgical debridement of the affected osseous structures. Our success with percutaneously placed catheters to treat suppurative arthritis in three cases, including a hip joint, a hip joint prosthesis, and an ankle/subtalar joint is promising. Hip joint infections in other series are associated with poor eventual results or, in the case of prosthetic joints, obligatory prosthesis removal and joint revision [8, 1 4, 1 5]. Our numbers are small, but the ability to manage an infected prosthetic joint or a deep joint infection nonoperatively may present a practical and attractive treatment option. Successful percutaneous catheter drainage obviates any morbidity
associated
with
uous drainage of the joint, intraarticular administration
guidance, portion
the catheter of the joint.
of catheter
dude
placement.
infection
surgical
drainage.
It allows
contin-
lavage of the joint, and if desired, of antibiotics. Under fluoroscopic
can be placed in the most dependent
We have Possible
of the joint
encountered
no complications
complications,
due to the presence
however,
in-
of a foreign
138
RENNER
AND
development of a fistulous tract, or particularly in a joint a delicate capsule such as the shoulder, capsular rupture if lavage volumes are too great [12].
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 221.176.181.221 on 11/05/15 from IP address 221.176.181.221. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved
5. Baciocco EA, lIes AL. Ampicillin and kanamycin concentrations in joint fluid. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1971:12:858-863 6. Argen AJ, Wilson CH, Wood P. Suppurative arthritis, clinical features of 42 cases. Arch Intern Med 1966; 117:661-666
The Society a clinical
pediatric careers
for Pediatric or laboratory
imaging. in pediatric
be submitted
purpose,
Radiology
(SPR) project
and
radiology is Feb.
methods,
to the
SPR.
Eligible
and pediatric radiologists. 1 1 990. The application ,
materials,
planned
Education
is requesting that
The purpose of these grants imaging. On completion, the
for presentation
in diagnostic of applications
1 4. Chartier Y, Martin WJ, Kelly PJ. treatment of 77 patients. Ann Intern 1 5. Kelly PJ, Martin WJ, Coventry MB. adult. J Bone Joint Surg 1970;52A:
Research
research
of the diffusion
analysis
will
involve
Grants
grant
applications
some
aspect
of
is to stimulate and advance results of the research must applicants The deadline must include procedure,
Louis,
Washington
University
MO 631 1 0. For information
Medical
Center,
by telephone:
across
of septic modes of a general diagnosis
Bacterial arthritis: experiences Med 1959:50:1462-1474 Bacterial (suppurative) arthritis 1595-1602
include
trainees
for submission a statement proposed
of
budget
details, and background discussion. Copies of the curricula vitae of all investigators should be appended. The maximal amount to be awarded for any one grant is $5000. Send applications to William H. McAlister, M.D., Dept. of Radiology,
of penicillin
cavities. J Lab Clin Med 1946:31:535-543
13. Proubasta IA, Celaya Fl, Cadafalch JA, Palacio AH. Percutaneous drainage of septic joints (letter). AJR 1988;1 51 :1057
1971:284:349-353
for
CB. A study
ofjoint
January 1990
8. Goldenberg DL, Brandt KD, Cohen AS, Cathcart ES. Treatment arthritis: comparison of needle aspiration and surgery as initial joint drainage. Arthritis Rheum 1975:18:83-90 9. Manshady BM, Thompson GA, Weiss JJ. Septic arthritis in hospital 1966-1 977. J Rheumatol 1980:7:523-530 1 0. Bayer AS. Nongonococcal bacterial septic arthritis: an update on and management. Postgrad Med 1980:67:157-165 1 1 . Thiery JA. Arthroscopic drainage in septic arthritides of the mulicenter study. Arthroscopy 1989:5:65-69 1 2. Sanders TA, Staple TW. Percutaneous catheter drainage of septic joint. Radiology 1983:147:270-271
1 . Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography: a new technique. Acta Radio! 1953:39:368-376 2. O’Meara PM, Bartal E. Septic arthritis: process, etiology, treatment outcome. Orthopedics 1988;1 1 :623-628 3. Parker RH, Schmid FR. Antibacterial activity of synovial fluid during treatment of septic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1971:14:96-104 4. Nelson JD. Antibiotic concentrations in septic joint effusions. N EnglJ Med
Radiology
HL, O’Neil
the serous membranes
REFERENCES
for Pediatric
AJA:154,
7. Hirsh HL, Feffer
body, with
Society
AGEE
51 0 5. Kingshighway, (31 4) 454-6229.
St.
knee:
a
shoulder
catheter in the in the